To truly solve a problem, one often had to start from the root! So, what was the root of the mystery of the Egyptian pyramids?
Since the prehistoric extraterrestrial civilization, the lost prehistoric civilization, the prehistoric underwater civilization, and all other advanced civilizations were rejected one by one, then, what other advanced civilizations could possibly have influenced the creation of this ancient miracle behind the scenes? The exploration seemed to have reached a dead end in time…However, the author believed that if he wanted to solve the mystery of the ancient world, he might as well think more open-minded! Set your sights higher! In the long river of history, couldn't the future affect the past? Why not? In other words, following this reverse train of thought, we can completely consider future civilizations. In order to prove that the future civilization was related to the Egyptian pyramids, the first thing to be proven was whether it was possible to go back in time.
The late famous Astronomist Carl? Sagan had said that unusual conclusions required unusual evidence! In fact, there was a lot of evidence to prove that there was indeed a "time reversal" phenomenon. Since modern times, archaeologists have discovered a large number of man-made tools and human relics in prehistoric geological layers and determined their ages. The dating results of these archaeological discoveries show that these mysterious objects from the ancient world have a much longer history than we originally thought.
Prehistoric footprints and footprints left by time travelers were found almost all over the world, causing widespread debate and even threatening the orthodox status of Darwin's theory of biological evolution. These mysterious footprints across time were known as the incredible relics of Earth:
In the fifth volume of the American Science Magazine in 1822, it was clearly described that in 1817, the French explorer and archaeologist, Henry, was killed. The treasurer, Henry R. Thomas H.Benton found two human-like footprints on a limestone slab near the west bank of the South Mississipi River in St. Louis, USA. They were about 10.5 inches long, with scattered toes and flat soles. They were similar to footprints that were used to not walking for a long time. His footsteps were strong and powerful, and his footprints were natural. Every footprint clearly showed the muscles at the bottom of a human's foot. A deep impression, two feet long and one foot deep, was found in the same spot, apparently made by a scroll or roll of paper (see American Ancientology, 1885, Vol 7, p. 364 -367), and all signs pointed to: The impression was made when the rock was soft. According to the appraisal, this limestone slab had a history of 270 million years.
In 1922, geologist and mine engineer John? Reid found a shoe fossil in a rock in Nevada, USA. To be precise, it was the back half of a shoe. The soles of the shoes were clearly visible on the rocks, and even the stitches in the shoes could be seen clearly. The fossil was later discovered by John. Reid went to New York and invited a geologist from Colombia University and three professors from the American Museum of Natural History to conduct an analysis. In the end, they agreed that the fossil originated from the Triassan period, about 213 million to 248 million years ago. Later, an expert from the Rockefeller Research Institute examined the fossil under a microscope and concluded: Based on the intricate stitching techniques shown in the fossil, it seemed certain that it was a fossil of an artificial product.
An American amateur geologist found a fossil with a shoe print in the Fisher Canyon in the United States. This fossil was caused by the soil brought up by the heel when it left the ground. The preservation of the shoe print was surprisingly good, and the fossil could be traced back to the Triassic-period limestone 225 million years ago. The fossil was discovered in 1927. However, when scientists recently reconstructed the ruins with microphotography, they discovered that the leather of the heel was stitched together by two lines. The two lines were 1/3 inch apart and extended in parallel. Such shoemaking technology did not exist in 1927. Samuel Hubbard, honorary curator of the Oakland Museum of Archeology in California, concluded with this fossil: "The humans on Earth today are still unable to sew shoes like that. In the face of evidence that highly intelligent humans existed on Earth billions of years before the apes were civilized..."
In 1934, in the North of Texas, about 6 kilometers away from the city of Stynette, an employee of the American Gulf Oil Company, A? M? Mr. Coffey found nine human-like footprints of different sizes, as if carved into the rock. After that, archaeologists, geologists, and anthropologists also came to investigate. After careful analysis, scholars believed that these footprints were indeed incredible. This was because the stratum around the site where the footprints were found belonged to the stratum 252 million years ago. According to the geological time, it was the Permian period (290 - 251 million years ago). Creatures that lived during this period included plants that were mainly ferns, giant amphibians, and reptiles. At this time, dinosaurs had yet to appear. Coffey had brought back some of the footprints from the scene, which were still on display in the exhibition hall in Stynet City. Another set of footprints found at the same site was later transferred to Truman. Mr. Tucker's hand was finally displayed in the Kenton Town Museum in the state. Later, people called Coffey's footprints "Coffey's footprints" and Tucker's footprints "Tucker's footprints". These "human footprints" were not only clear, but they were also in pairs. The footprint was about 21 centimeters long. Coffey's was the footprint of his right foot, while Tucker's was the footprint of his left foot. Moreover, among the Coffey Footprints, there were footprints that were 12 centimeters long and were thought to be children's footprints. Probably because the child was light, he did not sink deep into the mud. The "adult footprints" were about two centimeters deep from the surface of the rock. It was thought to have been formed by the weight of the person walking. There were also mud splatters around, and the toes left a very clear shape. The results of the CT scan showed that the footprints were very natural from an anthropological point of view and were not artificially made. In addition, the depth, distribution, and shape of the footprints were caused by the walking of creatures that weighed the same as humans. Therefore, some experts believed that these footprints were not man-made, but footprints left behind by walking on muddy roads.
In 1938, Wilbur, the director of the Department of Geology at Burry College, Kentucky-USA, was awarded the title. Dr. W.C.Burroughs announced that he had found 10 identical human footprints in a limestone from the early carbonatite period 250 million years ago. The location of the fossil footprints was now a private farm. It was a piece of hard exposed sand, but in ancient times, it was a beach. Micrographs and infrared photos proved that these footprints were naturally caused by the pressure of human feet, not artificially carved. Firstly, there were no signs of carving or cutting. Secondly, he measured the sand grains per unit area with the help of a microscope. The result was the same, that is, the sand density inside the footprint was much higher than outside the footprint. In addition, he also found that although the density of the sand in the arch was higher than the density of the sand on the outside, it was lower than the density of the sand in the heel. Obviously, this matched the structure of the human foot. Thirdly, there was a slight bulge in the sand around the footprints. This is the truth. Whenever we walk on soft ground, we will find that: When he stepped on the ground, he created a downward pressure, forcing the soil around his feet to rise. It was obvious that the footprints had indeed been stepped on, and it was impossible for them to be imprinted on it later. His research lasted for more than 20 years. Could it be some other creature? said Dr. Burroughs. There were no footprints of the front foot. The rock that had preserved footprints was still there. If they climbed over, there would definitely be footprints of the front foot. Moreover, some of the footprints were wearing seven-and-a-half-inch " shoes "! The October 29, 1938 Science Newsday commented that the fossil record did not find such a large earthworm or reptile that walked upright in the early carbonatite period 250 million years ago. Finally, it could be clearly seen that the footprints were five-toed, and the toes and heels were spherical. It had nothing to do with the shape of an earthworm or reptile, only the human foot.
In 1948, the Natural History magazine Wild reported that a shoe print was found near Lake Windermoor in England, appearing 500 million years ago on the incredible Ordovian limestone! What was unusual was that it had the characteristics of a craft: There were circular, rough seams on the heel and the front of the shoe. Moreover, there were faint line and flower patterns on the soles and heels of the shoes, as if they were designed. Although the cracks on the surface of the rock were a little out of shape, it was still possible to measure that the shoe was 3.5 inches wide and 8 inches long.
In 1961, a Soviet magazine reported: In 1959, a Chinese and Soviet paleometrician expedition team led by Dr. Chen Zhouming discovered a shoe print fossil left by a shoe with a sole in the Gobi Desert of Central Asia. The footprints appeared on the sandstones from 15 million years ago. The members of the expedition team examined the footprints carefully and immediately recognized that they were not the footprints of any animal. The ridges were too neat and regular, and were definitely not natural products.
Trilobites were a type of arthropod that lived in the Cambrian and Ordovian periods of the Palaeozu era. They had long since become extinct 5.4 to 250 million years ago. Its fossil is one of the oldest known fossils. The most peculiar one was William, the supervisor of Heckel Company. J? William J. Meister, as an amateur fossil enthusiast, found several trilobite fossils in Cambrian-era deposits in Antelope Springs, Arizona, on June 1, 1968. To his surprise, he found the footprints of an adult wearing a casual shoe and a child on a trilobite fossil. They were about 10.25 inches (26 cm) long, 3.5 inches (8.9 cm) wide at the front, and 3 inches wide at the back. The heel was 1/8 inch deeper than the front, just like the footprints of the right foot of an ordinary person today, embedded in the rock. He recounted,"When I used the geological hammer to gently crack open a piece of stone, the stone piece opened like a book. I was surprised to find that there was a human footprint on one piece, and a trilobite in the middle. The other piece also showed the shape of an almost intact footprint. What was even more strange was that those people were wearing leather shoes!”Meister published the news in the local Dessler News. Then, in July 1968, the famous geologist, Dr. Berdyk, went to Antelope Spring and found another child's footprint. In August 1968, Peter, an instructor at Salt Lake City Public School, found two human footprints wearing shoes in the same rock that contained trilobites. At that time, there were no humans on Earth, nor monkeys, bears, or lazy beasts that could make footprints similar to those of humans. So, before the evolution of vertebrae, what kind of human-like animals would walk on this planet?”Of course, there were also scholars who believed that Meister's discovery was fake and that it was a natural depression. However, there were three reasons why it was true: 1. It is unlikely that a natural depression like a human footprint would appear in nature. The probability of such a coincidence is very low. 2. It would make sense if a single footprint was a coincidence, but the problem was that there were multiple footprints and shoe prints in the same place. 3. If the footprints were a coincidence, then what were the footprints? Would a natural depression form a fossil similar to a shoe print?; Cramer and Thompson's "Archeological Forbidden Zone" detailed more than 500 pieces of evidence, accompanied by clear photos.
The more recent footprints were found in the Calizo Valley in northwest Oklahoma in 1970. The footprints were made between 155 million and 100 million years ago (Morrisonite and Dakota Sandstone periods). The light footprints were slightly eroded, but the ridges were still clearly visible. A few of them were very close to the dinosaur footprints. The footprints were even clearer, showing that the wearer was of moderate build. The footprints were 20 inches from front to back and 8 inches from left to right.
In 1983, Professor Amonyazov of the Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Turkmenistan also found human-like footprints in rocks that were 150 million years old. Similarly, the footprints of four people were found on the Triassic-period rock surface in Fuyuan County, Yunnan Province, China. According to research, these rocks had a history of 235 million years.
On March 20, 1997, Hai Tao, a retired teacher from the No. 11 Middle School in Xinjiang, discovered a strange fossil similar to human shoe prints in Hongshan, Xinjiang. The fossil was unearthed in the limestone, shales, and oil shales of the Late Palaeozoic-Permian inland lake basin, about 270 million years ago. The footprint was 26 centimeters long, wide at the front and narrow at the back, with double seams. The left side of the footprint was clearer than the right side, and the depression was shallow in the middle and deep at both ends. It looked like a human left foot footprint. In the second half of the footprint, there was a 13-centimeter long fossil of an ancient codfish, which lived in the late Mesozoic-Permian period. It was worth mentioning that in the summer of 1987, Haitao had found another shoe print fossil about 5 kilometers away from the second discovery point. At that time, he could not understand it and threw it away.
On Earth, when did prehistoric apes first develop feet similar to ours? The answer was that it was the southern ape (Archaeus afarensis) from four to three million years ago. Humans had been able to wear decent shoes for less than 3,000 years. How could all of this be explained?
In addition to prehistoric footprints and shoe print fossils, there were also prehistoric hand print fossils. Fossilized rocks were usually formed in rocks with thousands of years of history. The " human handprint " fossil on a limestone in the Arctic Circle of Canada had a history of 110 million years. On a piece of slate near Delta, USA, archaeologists found a human handprint fossil estimated to be 300 to 600 million years old.
It was only a few hundred thousand years ago that humans learned to make tools. However, people had found artificial things in ores formed tens of millions or even hundreds of millions of years ago.
In the 16th century, Francesco, the Spanish governor of peru, was killed. Virtue? In Toledo's office, there was a piece of rock with an 18-centimeter-long nail sticking out of it. It was personally sent by a quarry to ask him for advice. The latter conducted a detailed study and confirmed this discovery. One of the strange things was that iron was not known to the Native Americans at that time, so the nails could not have come from them. The second strange thing was that the rock where the nails were hidden was 75000 to 100000 years old. A letter from 1572, now in the Madrid archives, records this miracle.
On June 22, 1844, The Times of London reported: Quarrying miners in Rathford, near the Tweedd River in Scottish, found a gold thread hidden in a rock eight feet underground. It was confirmed that the rock was 360 million years old.
In 1845, David, England. In a report provided by Sir David Brewster to the British Society for the Advancement of Science, a nail was found in the Kindgoodie quarry near Inkyra in Wales. One end of the nail was embedded in the stone. Although the nail had been corroded, it could still be identified. According to the appraisal, this piece of sand rock was at least 40 million years old.
In December 1851, a gold digger and businessman, Hiram? De? Witt had brought back a palm-sized gold-plated crystal from California. When he showed it to his friend, the stone slipped from his hand and broke when it fell to the ground. In the middle of the broken stone, they found an iron square nail. It was slightly corroded, but it was very straight and had a complete nail head. The nail had been tightly embedded in the middle of the crystal stone, which had been tested to be 1 million years old. In the same year, the United States 'Elyroth Spingfield Republic also reported on this matter.
On June 5, 1852, Scientific American (Vol. 7, p. 298 - 9) reported under the title "A Relic of a Bygone Age," the discovery of a metal vase that had been blown in two and flew out of the rocks during an explosion in Dorchester, Mass. The two halves combined to form a bell-shaped vase that was four and a half inches (11.43 centimeters) high, six and a half inches (16.51 centimeters) wide at the base, two and a half inches (6.35 centimeters) wide at the mouth, and an eighth of an inch (0.3 centimeters) thick. The vase was made of a zinc-silver alloy, with a large proportion of silver. The bottle was also inlaid with six flowers made of pure silver, arranged in clusters. The bottom was surrounded by vines, which were also inlaid with pure silver. The carvings and mosaics were exquisitely done, and the local press praised them as "exquisite." It broke out of the rock 15 feet below the ground and was estimated to be 100,000 years old. But unfortunately, the vase had been passed around the museum for a long time and had gone missing. It was likely that it was dusty in the basement of a museum and forgotten.
1 Please note: Scientific American, a veteran magazine founded in 1845 by Scientific American, is the most authoritative and highest-quality science magazine in the United States and possibly the world. All of its popular science articles were written by academic authorities in that field. The authenticity of the information published should be guaranteed.
In December 1852, an iron tool shaped like a drill bit was found in a large piece of coal in a coal mine in Wales. The surface of the coal was undamaged, and no holes could be found.
Mount Tabor in the United States was located in the western part of Usmat National Park in Turumni County, California. In the decades of the 19th century, countless ancient artifacts were discovered in this area, and this area became famous. During the pioneer era, the gold rush that lasted for several years in the western United States led to the formation of countless mines in this area. 1853-1877 In 2000, spears, stone mortars, and so on, which were 35 to 33 million years old, were excavated in the mine. All the artifacts discovered were concentrated in the extremely solid gravel layer formed in prehistoric times. One day in 1853, some gold-bearing gravel was extracted from a mine 37.5 meters above the surface. Amidst the gravel, people were surprised to find a round ball made of white marble. It was about 3.81 centimeters long and 2.54 centimeters in diameter. There was a small hole about 0.6 cm in diameter in the middle of it. In 1858, people found a stone axe about 15 centimeters long in a mine 90 meters deep in the Tabor Mountains and 18 meters above the surface. The stone axe also had a 10-centimeter-wide section with a hole at the top for a wooden handle. In 1862, a stone mortar with a diameter of only 7.62 centimeters was found in a nearby mine tunnel about 60 meters below the surface. In 1869, a famous American geologist and head of the US government's geological research department, Clarence? King was exploring and studying the geological structure of Mount Tabor when he chanced upon a stone pestle and mortar embedded tightly in the hard gravel. After some effort, he used a tool to pry the pestle and mortar out. He noticed that there was a complete mold of a pestle and mortar on the base of the rock. At this point, he could conclude with certainty that the pestle and mortar was as old as the gravel rock, millions of years old. By 1877, more artifacts had been discovered in the rocky layers of Mount Tabor. One afternoon, in a tunnel 420 to 450 meters away from the mine, a indebted man accidentally found several obsidian spear heads in the gold-bearing rock formation, each about 25.4 centimeters long. Then he found two stone mortars a few feet away, one of which had a stone pestle on it. Since there were no signs of human destruction in the rock layer, and there were no natural gaps to enter, it was certain that these items were not a prank. A report on these extraordinary discoveries was submitted to the American Geological Society in 1891. After careful study, geologists came to the conclusion that it really existed.
In 1865, Americans found a 2-inch (5.08 cm) iron screw in a long stone in the Abbey mine in Treasure, Nevada. The screw had long since been oxided, but the shape of the screw could still be seen from the marks in the boulder. After testing, the stone was 21 million years old.
In August 1870, three men were digging an artesian well at Law Ridge, 20 miles from Peoria, Illino. They drew a small metal coin from more than 100 feet underground. One of them, Moffret from Chillicothe, was the first to discover it. Professor Wincher, a well-known scholar at that time, recorded the incident in detail in his book, Sparks from the Geologist's Hammer. The records came from another eyewitness, Wilmault, and included the deposits at different depths during the drilling process. This strange coin was made of an unknown copper alloy, and its size and thickness were equivalent to 25 cents at that time. The thickness of the coin was quite uniform, and the edge seemed to have been cut. Researcher Du Bois reported his investigation of the coin to the American Philosophy Society. He confirmed that the coin had passed through a rolling mill, and that its edge showed "further evidence of a machine workshop." Despite the coin's modern characteristics, Dubois clearly pointed out that "its traces of time are obvious." There were pictures and hieroglyphic characters on both sides of the coin, but they were not carved or imprinted. To be more precise, the pattern was etched with acid in a certain way, and it was intricate. On one side of the coin, a woman wearing a headscarf could be seen. Her left arm was raised as if she was giving a blessing, and her right arm was carrying a child who was also wearing a headscarf. The woman seemed to be talking. On the other side of the coin, there was also a picture in the center, which looked like a crouching beast: It had long and pointed ears, large eyes, and a huge mouth. It had four claw-shaped limbs, and the end of its long tail had traces of wear and tear. To its left was another animal that looked like a horse. The outer edges of both sides of the coin were decorated with unrecognizable words, the shape of which was clear, showing some kind of alphabetic text. In 1876, Professor Wincher presented the coin at a meeting of the American Society's geographical division in Buffalo. There were many speculations, but few answers. One of the attendees, the conservative historian Professor Lesley, tried to explain it as a prank. A passing French or Spanish explorer deliberately threw the coin down. He even claimed that the pattern on the coin was an astronomical symbol of Pisces and Leo, and the text was 1572. Professor Wincher refuted,"(1) To interpret patterns and words by some known symbol or symbol is pure fantasy. (2) Who would be so mischievous as to throw a metal object into a hole and predict that someone would dig a well in the same place (within 4 inches) and find it hundreds of years later? The chances of that happening were extremely slim. (3) It is very difficult to explain the 114 feet of deposit buried in the coin. After studying all the evidence, Professor Wincher confirmed that the coin was indeed unearthed from that depth. It did not fall into the hole because the excavated deposits were uniform and showed no signs of interference. Such a large amount of deposits could not have formed in just a few centuries. In fact, according to the uniform velocity theory of the impact layer and the measurement of radioactive materials, the deposited material below 100 feet was 100,000 to 150,000 years old. This enigmatic coin isn't the only object unearthed from the depths of Illinois.1 In 1851, another Whiteside County well digging crew dug out two bronzes from 120 feet of sand: It looked like a hook and a loop. It is estimated that they are as old as coins, about 150,000 years old.
In 1880, a farmer in the United States of America dug up a piece of coal. When he chiseled the coal, he found an iron inlaid ring inside. Later, according to research, this piece of coal with embedded rings was dug out from 45 meters underground. The coal mine was formed about 70 million years ago.
On November 1, 1885, an iron casting plant in Schondorf, near the town of Vocklabruck in northern Austria, was located between Salzberg and Linz. When a worker knocked on the hard brown coal, a metal object that looked like a parallel hexagon rolled out from inside. The volume was 6.6 cm x 6.6 cm x 4.57 cm. It was raised on both sides, surrounded by deep grooves, and had a regular shape. From the surface, it looked like a very strange snuff bottle. It was obvious that it had been processed by the hands of intelligent creatures. This iron cube is currently kept in the eimathaus museum in the town of Wakrabrook, Herrn O.R.Bernhardt. From 1966 to 1967, experts from the Vienna Museum of Natural History carefully studied this piece of iron using electron beam microanalysis. They found that there was no trace of Ni or Cobalt in the iron, which meant that it was not a meteorite. And no sulfur was detected, eliminating the possibility that it was iron sulfur, a natural mineral with a geometric shape. Because of the low content of calcium, the Viennese geologist Dr. R.Gill thought that this thing was cast iron. In 1973, Hubert Mattliiner concluded from another detailed study that the object was made by pressing large pieces of hand-carved wax or clay into a sand mold and casting it into iron to form a mold. The final conclusion was that this strange thing was indeed man-made. What could not be explained was that it was wrapped in coal from the tertiary period, which had a history of 60 million years.
On June 9th, 1891, a village woman, S? W? When Mrs. S.W.Culp was breaking the coal, she found a delicately made gold chain in the coal, the ends of which were tightly embedded in the two pieces of coal. The two pieces of coal were originally a whole, but they were only separated when they were broken. The coal was formed during the carbonifer period, about 260 million to 320 million years ago. After inspection by experts, it was an eight-carat gold chain, about ten inches (25.4 centimeters) long and weighing about 12 grams. The Morrisonville Times of June 11 of the same year reported that investigators were convinced of the authenticity of the discovery because a portion of the coal was still stuck to the chain, and the part that was separated from the coal still had the mark of the chain in the coal. According to current historical theories, the earliest golden chains appeared in ancient Egypt and the ancient civilizations of the two rivers, about 5500 years ago. But it was worth noting that the material they usually used at that time was pure gold, and the gold chain that Mrs. Colp discovered used alloy technology.
In 1912, when two workers at an electronics factory in Thomas, Okla., were shoveling coal into the factory's fireplace, a piece of coal was too big, so the workers smashed it with a large hammer. The coal cracked and they were surprised to find an iron pot wrapped inside. After removing the iron pot, the two halves of the coal that had cracked were pieced together to form the model of the iron pot. The two workers signed their names to confirm that they had found the item. After several experts 'tests, it was confirmed that the coal that wrapped the iron pot was excavated from coal 325 million years ago. Later, the experts were unwilling to comment on the iron pot and its discovery.
In 1934, Emma Smith, from London Town, Texas, USA, was born in the United States. Hahn found a piece of wood sticking out of a rock next to a waterfall. Unexpectedly, the piece of wood was actually the handle of a hammer! The mysterious hammer was 3 cm in diameter and 15 cm in length. The wooden handle inside the hammer head had been charred, and the lower end could be seen to have been sawed. According to Carl, the person in charge of the museum? According to the information provided by Boff, this hammer was unearthed from the cretaceous sandstones between 140 million and 65 million years ago. In 1989, the Butler Institute in Columbia, Chou, analyzed the metal part of the hammer. The composition of the iron was very pure, without any pores mixed in. It had the quality that could only be achieved by the highest industrial smelting technology. The hammer is currently kept in the Grayson Museum in Texas.
In 1952, in California, an artesian well expert, Frederick? Heihe accidentally found an ancient iron chain in a hole 11 meters below the surface. When he found it, the iron chain was tightly embedded in the hard sand. The chain was made up of a main ring and several smaller rings.
Miners found hundreds of metal balls on South Africa's Clerk Hills, and the layers of the earth where the balls were located were about two billion years old. The grooves surrounding the iron balls were so delicate that iron-making experts found it difficult to explain their natural formation. The top and bottom of these metal balls were flat, and there were three clearly carved grooves in the middle. Surprisingly, one of the balls could rotate on its axis.
The history of humans knowing how to put on clothes was only 4600 years ago, and nails from 20,000 years ago were discovered and confirmed around the world. In 1968, archaeologists Y.Druet and H.Salfati found a metal tube in the cretaceous stratum 65 million years ago in a place called Saint-Jean de Livet in France. The list of man-made metal objects that were even earlier than the rock-forming period could go on for a long time…
Other than that, there were also many items left on Earth from prehistoric and ancient times that showed signs of a highly civilized civilization.
A huge iron pillar stands in the temple of the Shamal Harori Monument near the Indian city of Derry. This iron pillar was 6.7 meters tall, 0.37 meters in diameter, and weighed about 6 tons. It was cast from wrought iron and was solid. There were antique decorative patterns on the top of the pillar. It was estimated that the ancient iron pillar had a history of at least 4,000 years, and there was no rust at all. Phosphorus, sulfur, and wind and rain erosion had no effect on it. This was because 99.72% of the iron pillar was formed by extremely high iron smelting. It was impossible for modern humans to achieve such high iron smelting technology. Then, who forged this iron pillar?
The majestic ruins of the temple in Barbekvi, Lebanon, were the ruins of the temple of the primitive tribe of the Shem. The three rocks on the outer wall of the temple were estimated to weigh more than 1000 tons each. The Southern Stone (20.8 meters long, 4.8 meters wide, and 4.2 meters high) on the outer side weighed more than 1200 tons. The quarry was 800 meters away from the temple. How did the ancient people of the Stone Age move these boulders that were difficult to move even with modern technology?
Guns capable of firing gunpowder were first invented in 1304. It was only in the 17th century that arquebus guns were created, and the appearance of modern rifles was delayed until the 19th century. It could be seen that the invention and use of guns were something that happened in the past few hundred years. However, some archaeologists had discovered round holes similar to bullet holes on bones from thousands of years ago to tens of thousands of years ago. The fossil skeleton of an ancient bison was on display in the Moscow Museum of Paleology in the former Soviet Union. According to the test, the fossil was formed in the Neoliths from 8000 to 2700 B.C. However, what was surprising was that there was a smooth round hole on the skull of this bison fossil. Experts believed that only bullets could form such holes. However, people knew that humans in the Neoliths used polished stones as weapons to hunt. The most powerful weapon at that time was just a stone axe. If people from the Neoliths hunted bison, they might have used stone axes to break their skulls, stone spears, bows and arrows, or traps. However, no matter what, they would never use rifles to shoot at the bison and leave bullet holes in the bison's skull. So, who was the one who shot the bison in the Neoliths? In 1921, an ancient Neanderthal skull was discovered in Africa. On the left side of the skull, there was a round hole with a smooth edge. This round hole could only be formed by a bullet.(The wound belonged to a high-speed impact object. The hole was very smooth and the force was consistent.) According to research, the Neanderthals lived in the middle of the Paleoliths, about 70,000 years ago. At that time, humans had just learned how to use stone axes! Since the bullet is made of metal, it won't rot. The bullet should have stayed in the skull, but why didn't we find it? (You'll understand after reading this.)
In the late 1940s, Soviet archaeologists discovered a huge dinosaur tomb about 10 kilometers long in Central Asia, containing tens of thousands of well-preserved dinosaur fossils. Strangely, there was a small round hole on the left and right sides of their heads or shoulder blades. The caliber was very consistent, which seemed to indicate that these dinosaurs were killed by mass gunfire. However, the strange thing was that there were so many bullet holes, but not a single bullet was found. What was going on? (You'll understand after reading this.)
A stone is on display in a private museum in the ICA in peru (collector Dr. Javier Cabrera). There was a portrait of a person wearing clothes, shoes, and a hat. He was holding a telescope in both hands and observing the celestial body. At the same time, there was a meteor with a tail that was about to fly over his head. It was completely modern, but according to the investigation, it was a work from 10000 years ago. It should be noted that the first astronomical telescope was invented in the middle of the 17th century by Galilei, which opened the most basic step for human observation of celestial bodies. It had only been more than 300 years.
……
At present, people had three views on the relics of human activities buried in prehistoric geological layers around the world:
(1) The relics of the prehistoric super-civilization and prehistoric humans that were once glorious;
(2) It is the product of prehistoric aliens visiting Earth;
(3) It was evidence that could prove that time had reversed.
So let's do a preliminary analysis of these three views:
(1) Since the above has basically rejected the global prehistoric super-civilization formed by self-development, it will not be repeated here. On the other hand, if these were left behind by the prehistoric civilization, it would be different from the prehistoric man-made objects we found. 1. The absolute number of prehistoric metal man-made objects discovered by modern or modern people is actually not much. The Forbidden Area of Archeology only lists 500 at most. However, if there was really a prehistoric civilization that surpassed our modern civilization, the technological development of any civilization was closely related to the number and density of the population. Almost any civilization would have a huge increase in population and man-made products once it entered the industrial period, so the number should be in the tens of thousands. 2. The prehistoric metal man-made objects discovered by modern or modern people were found in extremely scattered locations. However, it was believed that the so-called highly developed prehistoric humans should also have the habit of burying garbage. If these prehistoric man-made objects were really left behind by the prehistoric civilization, they should be concentrated and distributed. 3. These prehistoric metal man-made objects were unearthed tens of millions or hundreds of millions of years apart, but none of them surpassed our modern civilization in terms of technological content (for example, there was no waste of electronic appliances). This is very strange. Could it be that any so-called prehistoric civilization would be destroyed when it developed to the level of our modern civilization?
(2) If these were the relics of prehistoric aliens, then there were also many inexplicable contradictions: Fossilized footprints were found in the geological layer hundreds of millions of years ago. Why are they so similar to the footprints of modern humans or late Homo Evolutis? They also have five toes, and the size distribution of their five toes is surprisingly the same as ours. It also had an arch and a heel, and both the size and shape were shockingly identical!! According to the theory of cosmic evolution, it was impossible for aliens to have the same feet as us Homo Spici.？Moreover, there were so many prehistoric shoe prints…How could aliens invent and design shoes that were exactly the same as the ones we made in the 21st century? (From the shoe prints, we can find that the shoes are strikingly similar to the double-stitched leather shoes or sandals worn by modern people.）If this was purely a coincidence, then please carefully calculate the true probability of such a "coincidence" appearing in nature.
Therefore, the only answer was to go back in time. Actually, OOParze objects could be divided into two categories: The first type is modern or modern man-made products that have been rediscovered thousands of years later. The second type was man-made products that were imitated by the ancient people after being taught by the visitors of time. Among them, if we discover the first type, it will be even more restricted. (Please think carefully again. Why are there only footprints and shoe prints? And no fossilized foot bones or shoes were ever found? Could it be that the prehistoric humans had to dispose of all the human skeletons on Earth before every civilization was destroyed? Was this necessary? It seemed that this could only be explained by special laws of physics.）
The famous American scientist John? After research and analysis, Professor Bukeri proposed the following theoretical assumptions about the space-time tunnel: 1. The " space-time tunnel " was an objective existence. It was invisible and untouchable. To humans, it was closed, but not absolutely closed. It would occasionally open, depending on who was accidentally pulled in. 2. The " space-time tunnel " and the human world were not in the same time system. Entering another time system, it was possible to return to the distant past or enter the future. This was because in the space-time tunnel, time had a directional and irreversible nature. It could rotate forward, reverse, or be relatively still. 3. For humans and matter on Earth, being sucked into the " space-time tunnel " meant a mysterious disappearance, and coming out of the " space-time tunnel " meant a mysterious reappearance. Since time in the space-time tunnel could be relatively static, being missing for decades or centuries was like a day or half a day.
In December 1915, during a war between the United Kingdom and Turkey, the Fourth Army led by General Novlek of the British Army was preparing to attack the Garabolia Peninsula, a military stronghold in the Dardanelle Strait of Turkey. On that day, the British soldiers bravely climbed up the hill one by one, holding high their flags and cheering as they reached the top of the hill. All of a sudden, a cloud descended from the sky and covered the top of the mountain, which was more than a hundred meters long. It was a reddish color under the sunlight and emitted a dazzling light. The commanders who were watching with binoculars at the foot of the mountain were also very surprised by this scene. After a while, the clouds slowly rose into the sky and then drifted away to the north. The commanders were surprised to find that the British soldiers on the top of the mountain had all disappeared. General Novlek led more than a thousand soldiers to the top of the mountain and personally planted the British flag. The flag was still flying on the top of the mountain, but no one was there.
On December 1st, 1937, the Nanjing Defense War officially began. The National Government mobilized more than 200,000 troops to gather inside and outside Nanjing, ready to fight the Japanese. On December 12th, the war suddenly changed. Tang Shengzhi, the commander of the capital garrison, issued an order to retreat from Nanjing. A regiment of the Sichuan Army had to retreat to Qinglong Mountain in the southeast of Nanjing, which stretched for dozens of miles and was densely forested. However, after more than 2000 people entered the Green Dragon Mountain, they never came out again. There was no trace of them…
One day in 1975, an incredible disappearance occurred in the Moscow subway. At 21:16 that night, a subway train drove from Belarusian Station to Blesno Station. It only took 14 minutes for the train to arrive at the next station. Who knew that within 14 minutes, the train suddenly disappeared without a trace. The sudden disappearance of the train and passengers forced the entire subway to be suspended. Under the command of experts sent by the Ministry of Internal Affairs, the police and subway managers launched a carpet search of the entire Moscow subway line. However, he still could not find the hundreds of passengers on the subway or the train. These people mysteriously disappeared on the subway line.
What was even more surprising was that on May 20th, 1978, in the southern United States, in the city of New Orlean, on the playground of a middle school, the physical education teacher Bakolov was teaching several students how to play football and shoot. The 14-year-old Barleck suddenly shot a goal into the goal. He jumped up happily and disappeared in the blink of an eye in front of everyone.
According to many foreign news media reports: On July 2, 1999, more than 100 Saints in Colombia, Central America, went to the top of Mount Arris to worship. This group of saints believed that the "end of the world" had arrived in August 1999. They went up the mountain to pray for God's salvation. Who knew that this group of believers did not come down after going up the mountain and disappeared. The incident alarmed the Colombia government. They sent a large number of police officers to search the area around the top of Arris Mountain and dispatched helicopters. In the past month, they had searched the entire mountain range of the Nevadas, but there was no trace of them.
With the disintegration of the former Soviet Union, some confidential files were continuously released. In August 1971, the former Soviet pilot Alexander? When Snoff was flying the MiG-21 on a routine flight, he accidentally " broke into " ancient Egypt. Thus, he saw the scene of the pyramid being built: In the endless desert, a pyramid stood tall, and another pyramid had just been built…The top-secret report from the North Atlantic treaty, the facts described in the report, were equally incredible: In 1982, during a flight training from Northern Europe, hundreds of dinosaurs appeared in his field of vision. The plane actually arrived in prehistoric Africa.
However, there were also some "prehistoric civilization ruins" that were the creation of nature and not the product of a high civilization.
Humans had discovered the existence of natural nuclear reactors as early as the 1970s and knew that nature had the ability to carry out nuclear reactions. The researchers at the University of Washington in the United States discovered the reaction mechanism of this process by analyzing the molecular structure of the noble gas produced during the fission reaction of a sample. The sample was from the Oklo natural nuclear reactor in West Africa, which was a rock fragment less than one-eighth of an inch. Uranium ores generally contained 0.72% uranium, but Oklo's ore contained less than 0.3%. Alexander, a physicist at the University of Washington? Dr. Meshko found that the working principle of this natural nuclear reactor was similar to that of a boiler by analyzing the structure of the helium in the sample. The reactor was made up of about 500 tons of uranium ore in six regions, and the output power was estimated to be 100 Kilowatts. The reactor had a reasonable structure and had been operating for 500,000 years. It was active two billion years ago, and each cycle lasted 30 minutes before it went dormant or cooled down for two and a half hours. In the professional journal Physical Review Letters, Mieszko and his collaborators published a related article. He said that the similarity between this nuclear reaction and the boiler revealed that half an hour after the start of the chain reaction, a large amount of water turned into water vapor, reducing the thermal neutron flux and making the reactor subcritical. The reactor needed two and a half hours to cool down until the fission helium began to accumulate again. Then, the water would return to the reaction zone, causing the neutrons to moderate and establish a self-sustaining reaction chain again. Mishko said that this natural reactor not only operated very accurately, but it was also very safe in the preservation of waste. It was even more advanced than the current artificial reactor. Our current reactor is facing many problems. Through the research of this natural reactor that has no electronic components, no model, and completely independent operation, it will help to improve the safety and efficiency of our nuclear reactor. The so-called "prehistoric humans" used nuclear reactors to produce electricity that was about the same as ordinary thermal power generators. This was really ridiculous.
Regarding whether natural nuclear reactions could be carried out, the opposing opinion believed that two conditions must be met: Uranium needed to have a certain concentration to undergo a chain reaction. Uranium-235 could undergo spontaneous fission with a half-life of T=1.8* 10 ^17a. The fission of heavy atomic nuclei generally occurred under the effect of neutrons, which was called induced fission. According to the neutron energy, it was divided into two situations: Nuclei that could be fissioned under the effect of low-energy neutrons were called fission-prone nuclei, such as Uranium-235 (this solved the neutron source problem); Nuclei that only undergo fission under the action of neutrons with energy higher than a certain threshold are called fissible nuclei; Uranium concentration was not a requirement. The key was to reach a critical level. Although the pressurized water reactor needed about 3% uranium to maintain the chain nuclear reaction, the heavy water reactor used natural uranium.
On February 13, 1961, Lanny, Mikel, and Maxi, the three partners of Lohenz Gem Gift Shop in Orancha, California, found a fossil on the peak of Mount Corso, which was 4300 feet above sea level twelve miles southeast of Orancha. When they used a diamond saw to cut open the fossil, the saw blade was broken by something hard. When they opened it, they found something unexpected! The fossil contained a geode, which contained the remains of some kind of mechanical device. The outermost layer was a mixture of clay, pebbles, and fossils, followed by a hexagonal material that was similar to wood and softer than agate. It encased a three-quarter-inch (1.9-centimeter) wide white ceramic cylinder, with a two-millimeter bright copper-colored metal shaft in the center. The quarrymen found that the shaft was magnetic. Although it had been exposed for many years, there was no trace of oxidization. The ceramic cylinder was surrounded by copper rings, most of which had rusted. In addition, there were two other artifacts hidden in the stone. They were not in the same position as the cylinder and looked like nails and cushions. Later, the quarrymen sent the discovery to the Charles Ford Association, an association that specialized in investigating unusual objects. The association X-rayed the cylinder contained in the fossil and confirmed that the wreckage was indeed part of a mechanical device. The X-ray showed that one end of the metal shaft had been corroded, and the other end was a metal spring or spiral. In general, this creation was considered a part of the machine. From the various components, such as delicate porcelain, metal shaft, and copper parts, it was likely to be part of an electronic device. After a study by Willis, the editor of Knowledge Magazine in the United States, he found that the closest modern device he could find was the spark plug of a car. This stone was the first "official" Opaz. However, with the development of research, its mystery gradually faded. After analyzing its fossilized shell, a geologist concluded that it was 500,000 years old. The identity of this scientist was never known, and his comments had never been published. However, he was certain that this stone was not a real crystal. There were also two hard objects hidden in the stone, like a nail and a bushing. These were undoubtedly more modern things. The discoverers of the stone sent it to the professional association, where they took many photos and X-rays. The test results confirmed that it was indeed part of a mechanical device, but the strange thing was that the X-ray showed that one end of the central metal shaft had been corroded, and the other end had a spring-like or spiral-like structure. Supporters of the Opaz hypothesis thought it couldn't be a spark plug: This was because modern spark plugs did not have a structure like a spring or a spiral terminal. The Pacific Northwest Skeptics 'Pierre? It was the same for Pierre Stromberg and Paul. The efforts of Paul Heinrich had finally turned the situation around: They sent the photos and X-rays to the Spark Plug Collectors of America. The head of the association, Richard? After careful analysis and comparison, he came to the conclusion in November 1999: Without a doubt, it was a spark plug. He also found its model, a sample from 1920. His explanation also clarified the function of the part that was similar to a spring or a spiral terminal: These spirals acted as a "balancing sleeve" to balance the difference in thermal expansion between the ceramic and metal shaft. Wyndham's explanation was also consistent with another detail. According to the documents, the area where the mysterious crystal was found was a mining area in the early 20th century. It was likely that machines equipped with old-fashioned internal combustion engines were used at that time. The spark plug fell into a deeper place and fused with the ore to form this puzzling stone.
In addition, it was said that fossils of giant footprints from the dinosaur era had been found in the Paluxy River bed in Glenn Rose, Texas. Two sets of footprints were found in the riverbed of the Paraxi River. One was the footprint of a dinosaur, and the other was similar to a human's footprint. However, the footprint was surprisingly large, about the same size as a dinosaur's footprint. Creationists claimed that these were the footprints left by giants in the Christian Bible. Around 1970, some creationists made a movie about it, promoting the fact that the footprints of dinosaurs and giants were mixed together as proof that dinosaurs and humans once lived together. This movie was widely shown in society and caused a lot of reactions. Creationists used it to make a big fuss, calling it the most powerful evidence to refute the theory of evolution. In order to clarify this matter, in the early 1980s, American scientists organized a team to investigate the area and quickly came to the conclusion: The so-called " giant footprints " were the same as the dinosaur footprints around them. They were all left by the same carnivorous dinosaur with two feet and three toes. However, because they stepped in the mud, the soil caved in to the footprints, making the footprints smaller. Only the central part was left, which looked a little like human footprints. But creationists rejected this conclusion. In the summer of 1984, due to the long period of no rain, the Barussi River dried up, and the footprints that were originally submerged in the water were exposed to the surface. Due to the color effect, the blurry edges of the footprints could be seen clearly. It clearly showed that there were three toes in the " giant footprints " that were left by dinosaurs. Two of them had three toes. Under the repeated urging of scientists, several leading figures of creationism in the United States went to the scene to see the exposed footprints. They were forced to publish articles in creationism journals admitting that they were dinosaur footprints and promised not to use them as a reason to attack evolution. There were also many "giant" footprints that were obviously man-made to deceive people.
The famous " Crystal Skull " was also very likely a scam. This was because carbon-14 also had things that could not be measured. For example, the " Crystal Skull " could not be dated because the crystal was very stable. Until now, there was no way to know whether the " Crystal Skull " was an ancient or modern masterpiece.
…………….
It was important to point out that, in fact, a considerable part of the evidence about time reversal was fake, but there was still some evidence that was true. Based on the materials he collected and his own judgment: He had already deleted a large amount of unreliable information.
This book is provided by FunNovel Novel Book | Fan Fiction Novel [Beautiful Free Novel Book]