Many great historians appeared in the book review section.
He pointed out many problems in the book.
1. Yang Guang's contribution was greater than Li Shiming's. Li Shiming was a scumbag!
Second, there was also the fact that Li Shiming was extremely cruel and had over-beautified himself.
Third, the story of Li Shimin and Wei Zheng.
---
Actually, what the author wanted to say was:
First of all, this is a fictional novel, a novel, not official history. Don't compare official history with novels.
Otherwise, everyone would not be talking about the Four Great Classics. They were basically novels.
Beautification was something that novels had to do. Just like in the Three Kingdoms, wasn't the imperial uncle infinitely beautified?
The real history of the Three Kingdoms, think about it with your toes. Would the person holding power be the kind of person who was very benevolent? Was the saying that kindness does not lead to war a lie?
Therefore, everyone just had to have fun.
I'm not trying to whitewash Li Shimin, I'm just supporting the protagonist.
Moreover, there was no good or bad in history, because if one was not in a position, one could not say who was good or bad at all.
In addition, history was always rewritten by the victors.
Not to mention Yang Guang being slandered, how badly had King Zhou been slandered? He was clearly the Human Emperor and had many great achievements. In the end, he was forcefully blackened by the Investiture of the Gods.
Can you explain these things clearly?
This was a novel.
For fun!
If you really want to be serious, please don't read novels, read official history ~
---
At the same time, he knelt down on the evaluation votes!!!!!!!!!!!
Kneel and beg!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
This book comes from：m.funovel.com。