He saw that many readers were arguing about Han Dynasty being ranked fifth in the book review section.
First of all, I hope that the readers can read it carefully.
Why was Han ranked fifth?
Because I divided the Eastern Han and Western Han into two dynasties.
No matter how weak the Eastern Han was, it accounted for 30% of the total achievements of the Han Dynasty, right?
In other words, 30% of them had entered the rankings, and 70% of them had also entered the rankings.
At the same time, although the Han Dynasty's military strength was extremely powerful, it was still a small matter.
However, if you take a closer look at the later years of Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty, you will find that he was a genius.
The entire population of the Great Han Dynasty was about to be wiped out. The commoners exchanged their children for food. To put it bluntly, it was a purgatory on earth.
....
Under such circumstances.
How could Han compare to Tang? Compared to the entire Tang Dynasty and the Western Han Dynasty, it wasn't too much to be a little higher, right?
There was no need to mention the Ming Dynasty. It had been explained before that out of the dozen emperors, only one or two were useless. The rest were considered qualified.
The last Qin.
Qin was ranked the highest in the dynasty. It was not too much, right?
This was publicly acknowledged, right?
Also, everyone, remember that I'm actually taking stock of the Dynasty. It's based on overall strength.
It wasn't just about the military.
In the eyes of the author.
Military affairs came first, people's livelihood came second, and then there were major achievements in economic development and cultural development.
According to this order, the overall score was given.
Therefore, those who made comments.
Ask yourselves, the fifth place of the Western Han Dynasty is not exactly the fourth place, because the first place is the flower family.
Was there anything wrong with that?
This book comes from：m.funovel.com。