Time: 2009-12- 22 14:14:26 Words: 12733
35
She thought that the leaders were the elites among the people and were highly respected people, but Yiren clearly saw that the leaders were also despicable people. There was a vice president. When a president gave him a pack of cigarettes worth 200 yuan, he asked the president to exchange the pack of cigarettes for five packs of cigarettes worth 40 yuan. Because his family was renovating the house, the cigarettes given to the workers were not too good! When Yi Ren heard the leader's words, she was really disappointed. She didn't expect the so-called leader to be so useless. Of course, the president was flexible. He bought ten packs of cigarettes worth forty yuan and gave them to the leader. After that, he went to the leader's house several times to greet the renovation workers. There was also a leader who took a receipt for purchasing household appliances to a certain court for reimbursement. The president gave the money to the leader, but changed the receipt for " household appliances " to an receipt for " pig feed ". This was because everyone could see the purchase of household appliances, but the purchase of pig feed could make the pig take the blame. This change naturally angered the leader and was considered to be deliberately insulting the leader. This president was demoted back then because of " poor results "... Is this a leader? The leader that Yiren thought represented success in life? There was also a leader who went to a certain court for an inspection and sneezed. The president immediately asked with concern," Do you have a cold?" He even took out 400 yuan for the leader to buy cold medicine. The leader slightly declined and accepted it with a clear conscience. 400 yuan for a sneeze. Is this how a leader should be? There was another time when the commoners surrounded a certain hospital director. He could have argued with reason and believed that the commoners would not dare to go overboard. However, the leader took the initiative to compromise. At that time, he called a certain judge and asked him to unseal the seized property! This was leadership? Are there still laws and principles? There was also a business trip where a certain leader wanted to wash his hair. When he came back from washing his hair, he boasted shamelessly,"That girl's breasts are really big. They're quite bouncy to the touch.”This was leadership? Was there still any seriousness?
Why is society getting worse and worse? The government had failed in its duties. The government had neglected some things that should not have been neglected. Because of poor supervision, unfair rules, improper employment, insufficient punishment, and mistakes in command…all kinds of problems had arisen. When problems had arisen, they had not been able to reflect on them in time and correct them in time, causing the mistakes to spread further and further, and the unhealthy winds to blow more and more fiercely…The government had not truly curbed evil and promoted good, clearly distinguished punishment and reward, and distinguished right from wrong. The rules were scientific, the supervision was moderate, and the rights and responsibilities were clear. One should not refrain from doing good because it was small, and should not do evil because it was small…Therefore, the social atmosphere mocked the government, took revenge on the government, and harmed the people.
Who was the absolute good person? Who would uphold justice! Who could he complain to? Who can point out a clear and concrete path for me to walk?
Nice and profound words are just rouge powder for women who dress up too much. It's useless for the article!
If you can't be an official, you can't carry forward the idea of being a good person. How can you carry on being a good person? Wouldn't the good guys disappear if they couldn't continue? For example, if you don't write an eight-part essay well, you're not a great writer. You have no right to comment on it, let alone oppose it! Then, shouldn't they place their hopes on those who weren't absolutely upright to promote the good people? Was this what it meant to save the country through a roundabout way?
There was no such thing as good or bad in the arts. There was only the standard of judging. If a Hong Kong film was judged by the standards of the Chinese film industry, it would be a pile of trash. It was the same for a Chinese film, but what about life? Who was the judge of life?
Yi Ren began to think more about the word "official". Why did he have to be an official? Was it to let outstanding talents stand out? Was it to let people of insight display their talents? What was the original intention of setting up the 'official' system? Was it to let everyone have someone to curry favor with? Was it to let ordinary people have a role model to learn from? In the past, he thought that an official was a public servant of the people, a person with high awareness, a person who was excellent in all aspects, and a mechanism to motivate everyone to work hard. However, he never expected that the officials he met were all selfish people. There was no nobility to speak of! Thinking about it carefully, an official must have special privileges. Otherwise, what was the point of having an official? "Officials" were people with special privileges and were superior to others. So why did they have to set up such a system that was different from others? Why not abolish the "official" system? Isn't it better for everyone to be equal? If there were no officials, who would manage it? Who would be responsible? Did the officials really manage it? Was he taking responsibility? However, the purpose of the "official" system was to let some people manage others! If being an official really only had obligations and no privileges, and was more troublesome than ordinary people, who would be an official? Giving you an official position immediately gave you power and benefits at the same time. This was the essence of being an official. If there were no benefits to being an official, why would taking off the official hat be considered a punishment? It seemed that the previous views were really too unrealistic, but who instilled such unrealistic views? Why did he have to instill a point of view that did not conform to reality?
He doubted the view that revolution was the only driving force for human progress. Revolution was cruel. If everything was destroyed, what progress could there be? Mankind had to constantly improve, so did it need to constantly be smashed into pieces? But didn't he 'insist' on the theory of revolutionary progress back then? They said that only revolution could overthrow one class, that revolution could truly change the world. Revolution was not like reform, which was mild and gentle. Revolution was the most thorough and intense, so revolution was the best. But heaven and earth did not need to change endlessly! If there were any contradictions, would it be in line with the laws of human development? Was it something that was truly beneficial to mankind?
Who was the good guy and who was the bad guy? What was right and what was wrong? Who knew?
What we are doing is not administration according to law, but administration with a black veil hat. If we can't do a good job, we will take off the hat. If we do a good job, we may add a hat. The greatest ability is to keep the black veil hat. There was no normal organizational relationship between officials at all levels. It was a vulgar hierarchical relationship. The higher the rank, the more oppressive it was. When officials saw high-ranking officials, they would really be embarrassed. They would even lose their dignity as a human being. How could there be normal comradeship? It had become the iron law of officialdom to flatter the superiors and bully the subordinates. Was this called jumping out of the cycle?
Life was just a bunch of blind jeers and torments. What meaning and nobility was there to speak of? Being busy all day without any actual results was like moving a stone from the house to the outside and then from the outside to the house!
How many things have I done that I once looked down on!
I have the misfortune to experience the life I once despised!
Yiren remembered that her mother had three principles when interacting with people. One was to curry favor with those in power, the second was not to offend evil people, and the third was to communicate with ordinary people sincerely. Yiren had always opposed these three principles of her mother. People in power are often rich and heartless or bully people with power. Why should I curry favor with him? The "evil person"(a person who had influence in the local area and no one dared to offend him) was an unjust person. It was right not to rope him in, but to not offend such a person without any principles, wasn't that not able to distinguish right from wrong? This kind of person should be kept at a respectful distance. On the contrary, he should not only sincerely interact with ordinary people, but should often help them. This was the highest principle of interacting with others. Therefore, Yiren opposed her mother's three principles and was determined to stick to her own three principles: Stay away from dignitaries, despise evil people, and help ordinary people. However, I found that these three principles did not work in real life. More people coincided with Yiren's mother, and national diplomacy seemed to be similar to her mother's principles... Didn't I also adhere to the teachings of the country? Why was the teachings of the country inconsistent with the principles of the country?
Was it so easy for people to adapt to the situation? Many of the things that he insisted on had become a part of his life and could not be changed easily. Back then, I was puzzled when I was torturing scholars. Why didn't those "scholars" pretend to be illiterate? Why did they have to be tormented? It was not easy to pretend to be a scholar, but it was easy to pretend to be illiterate. Now that he thought about it, it was not so easy to pretend to be a human. You did not know when you started to mess with scholars. Even if you knew, you would not think that studying was a sin. Besides, don't you have a lot of disappointments now? Why don't you change? Why don't you pretend to be another kind of person? Why don't you learn from others to suck up to them and treat them to gifts? How can you find yourself if you keep pretending? There might not be a fixed pattern for who was happy and who suffered. Even if he had to pretend, could he guarantee that he could keep up? Wasn't it another form of tiredness to follow him around? Was it better than being beaten up?
It was human instinct to pander to the government's views. Anyway, he didn't ask you to think about it. If he said it was right, why didn't you work hard to find evidence to support his point of view? Couldn't he numb himself?
How could there be a truly beautiful woman? Today, you think she is beautiful, but tomorrow, you will find her flaws. Therefore, when it comes to the issue of "beautiful women," you also need authority. Therefore, it is easier for public figures (actors, hosts) to become beautiful women. This is because the media is a kind of authority. Once they have formed an authority, they will not be questioned. There is no need to question it. Why should you deny a woman that everyone thinks is beautiful? Liking beautiful women was a form of vanity. Vanity needed to be acknowledged. A person's aesthetic wasn't vanity. It was vanity to cater to everyone's aesthetic.
The original article always liked to write that laborers were smarter than explorers. This was also not objective. If they were not smart, how could they become explorers? Whether it was the story of Liu Sanjie or Gao Yubao, they were all literary forms of venting the laborers 'hatred for the exploitors, and not the whole objective truth.
Should a gentleman look down on a villain? Wasn't everyone equal? Why could a gentleman look down on a villain?
I am experiencing the cruel rules of life.
Life was all about pretending and imitating. Literature was all about pretentiousness, politics was all about deception. One could not think independently!
Old Zhang married his daughter to Xiao Huang in order to obtain the contract rights to the lake. How snobbish! How could he use his daughter's love and happiness as a tool to gain benefits? However, in history, weren't daughters used as diplomatic tools for marriages between children? Why could a big shot use his daughter's marriage as a tool while a small person couldn't? Why was it that a big shot using his daughter could become a story of eternal beauty, while a small figure doing the same thing could only become an unjust person who was looked down upon by others?
A great writer who doesn't care about the times? Will I be a great writer? Why should I be a great writer? All titles are empty and vulgar. I know that my work may be ignored, but I don't care. I don't envy the vanity of a moment of fame.
People's success is accidental. There is no inevitable success? Do you dare to say that XX will definitely succeed? Would a certain XX method definitely make people successful? Only when they saw others succeed would boring scholars start to write biographies for them and summarize their experiences. Therefore, only by looking at it the other way (from success to the past) could there be a so-called road to success. If you looked along the way, you would not be able to see success.
Who was the most knowledgeable? People who can come up with new terms are the most knowledgeable! What team spirit? Isn't it just collectivistic? Do you have a brain? Wouldn't he be able to charm another group of people by changing his method and coming up with a new term? What was the " historical halo effect "? Didn't he just think that the past was good and the present was not as good as the past? When a scholar takes a new term, even a simple phenomenon becomes profound. What was " gray income "? Wasn't it just corruption and bribery? Don't you know how to find a new term to use?" Gray income " is good. It's not harsh, and there's no distinction between right and wrong. It's really brilliant. What was "power rent-seeking"? Wasn't it just abusing power for personal gain? You always use the term "abusing power for personal gain". "Power rent-seeking" was the result of other people's research. How could you not admire it? What was a 'solid ideal'? Isn't it an ideal that has been tested by practice and is close to reality? Why did he use such a mysterious new term? It was confusing. From then on, all romantic fantasies could die because they did not conform to the theory of "solid ideal"…It seemed that it was very easy to be a profound scholar. He just had to come up with a new term. In fact, the " transition period " was also a great invention. Transformation meant change. Could there be a society that had not changed? By creating a " transition period," they could be given special treatment and tolerate all abnormalities. Isn't that brilliant?
The people of China valued official positions too much. With an official position, they had everything. They hoped for an official position more than anything else. Therefore, only being an official was the eternal ideal of the people of China. Therefore, China could not produce Jordan. What was so great about playing basketball? There was no such thing as an mathematician who cared about the poor in China. Why should he work hard on something that was not beneficial to his career?
Is it because we are all stuffing agents and only a few people are the essence of society? But, didn't you recognize me as the elite of society and everything will revolve around me?
It was better not to make money to repay society! If you don't earn that money, isn't that money natural in society? If you take money from one group and then repay another group (the so-called repayment to society is impossible to truly repay to everyone in society), isn't it like you're blind in one eye?
The teacher likes students with good grades. Is the student bribing the teacher with good grades? Why were there books and teachers worshiping him? Because they had interacted with each other every day, they could be considered old acquaintances. This was because his teacher had unknowingly taken advantage of time and space!
Does a constitution that has been repeatedly changed still have any authority?
Didn't the constitution that should be changed hinder the development of productivity?
Then what else do we have to persist on? Perhaps the things you stubbornly insist on will be changed in the blink of an eye.
Are all ethnic minorities singing and dancing? It definitely couldn't be!
The newspapers were getting more and more vulgar. A very educational case was not published, but some gossip related to this case appeared in the newspapers: The plaintiffs were arrested by the police for visiting prostitutes before the court session, and the court dismissed the plaintiffs 'lawsuit on the grounds that they refused to appear in court without justifiable reasons. This was how a newspaper was, even a party newspaper. All day long, it would track down murder, sex, and perverted news. They thought that journalists would have a sense of mission and be responsible for history, but they didn't expect the same to happen in the propaganda field. However, there were still some people who insisted on high standards. Such people with rigid brains could only be replaced by flexible people. If all walks of life were led by flexible people, would they not worry about showing a scene of " prosperity "?
Thinking again, who was driving the development of history? What could be considered as pushing forward the development of history? Had history developed? Why did he have to push for the development of history?
It was a national disaster, but writers who became popular were the lucky ones of the era. Some people were happy, while others were worried. It was like investing in coal mining. Most people lost their capital, but a few people made a fortune and benefited from coal mining.
Self-improvement, attacking others, and arrogance are all human weaknesses. I will never allow myself to have them. However, it seemed that the country's previous propaganda did not escape this weakness. I'm more noble than the country?
The officials lied in the following sentences and in the meeting. Did they not feel guilty?
I thought I couldn't save anything, and I couldn't change anything!
It was a common occurrence in the newspapers. The news had become nothing more than leftovers. Everyone was used to it, but the media pretended to be passionate about saving the world and reported it tirelessly. Was the media really lagging behind? Were they numb? Was he confused? Was he retarded?
Have we been deceived? Was obedient education the greatest cheat education? Everything I learned in the past was a lie?
The endless stream of corruption cases had already exceeded Yiren's imagination and exceeded her psychological endurance. They thought that corrupt officials did exist, but they didn't expect the corruption to be so serious and on such a large scale. The official level kept rising, and they were even promoted to the vice-national level. The amount of corruption was even higher. If it wasn't more than tens of millions, it wouldn't be considered news. The scale of the corruption was so large that it was like digging a rat hole, and it was spreading out one nest after another…What was going on? Wasn't he supposed to serve the people? Wasn't he supposed to fight for the cause of Communism for his entire life? Why did he say one thing and do another? When he started to corrupt, it was also unprecedented? We were really deceived too much in the past. Don't I believe that I know the evils of society? Why was he flabbergasted after seeing these reports? Compared to those corrupt officials, my persistence in the past is a joke. Those officials had really let down the trust of the people and fooled the kind hearts of the people! What was the use of telling these people about "letting them down" and "kindness"? Are you still ignorant?
There was a set of logic that Yiren called the government's logic. It was a way for the government to explain problems. Yiren felt that some of the government's logic was quite far-fetched. Sometimes, it was even backed by power. To put it bluntly, it was impossible to justify itself. For example, if the government did a good deed and did not leave its name, it was the government that publicized it, but the government had a special publicity organization to publicize the good deeds of the government. There was a contradiction between publicity and non-publicity. The government said that it was not unfair to divide the college entrance examination scores by province. It was a realistic and fair policy based on the different levels of cultural development in the provinces. They were all humans. If you scored 400 points in Beijing, you could get into Peking University. If you didn't score 650 points in Hubei or Zhejiang, don't even dream about it. This was clearly unfair, but the government had a hidden problem. In the beginning, they used far-fetched reasons such as " inconsistent grading standards " to barely make sense of it. In any case, there was a strong guarantee later on. They weren't afraid that a few people would raise objections. If it got annoying, they would use different papers in different provinces to make it impossible for you to compare. Let's see if you still want to say it? It was also said that the development of each place was different and the needs were different, so the admission score was different. However, didn't each place need graduate students? Why did they have the same requirements when they were graduate students? Was there no difference in development? There was also the universal theory of " Chinese characteristics ". If there was anything that could not be explained with a convincing reason, they would use " Chinese characteristics " as an excuse. Little did they know that there should be a reason for " Chinese characteristics " and it was not something that could be said to be good.
He suddenly had a strange thought: Why should officials do things for the people? Was there a justified reason?
Why don't I give up everything and finish writing a work that represents the true meaning of life? What is controlling me? He couldn't delay any longer. He had to give up on things that he shouldn't insist on but insisted on unconsciously. He had to concentrate on writing. Anyway, he wouldn't starve to death. What was the point of suffering for something he liked and something meaningful? But why didn't I start? Some people said that persistence was victory, and sincere writing was success, but there were also people who said that not everyone could write. If you weren't the material for writing, don't blindly persist. It was better to find another thing to do as soon as possible. Perhaps you could have some results. There was only a dead end for sticking to the tree of writing. Am I cut out for writing? Who was the material for writing? Someone who said such things must be good at writing? Was Cao Xueqin cut out for writing? Was Cao Xueqin dead? Why did he need 'material' to write true thoughts? Wasn't it enough to just record them truthfully? Was it difficult to record truthfully? Didn't he say that writing didn't require technique? Why did he say that if he wasn't cut out for writing, he shouldn't insist on writing? What exactly was writing? Should I insist on writing? Who should I listen to? Was there something hidden inside? To say that writing didn't require skill, was this the self-deprecation of someone who was good at writing? Were they also lying? Who cares? How could he give up on something that he had persisted for so many years? Who cares what material it is, who cares if it has any meaning, just finish writing it first!
The new Goldie asked Yiren to borrow money.
Although Goldie was new, it had been three months since he had arrived. He was the son of Chief Huang of the court's audit department. According to the rules of the court, every cadre could arrange for one of their children to wait for employment in the court. The monthly salary was 200 yuan. When they arrived at the court, they had to complete the task first before they were paid. Therefore, there was a possibility that their monthly income would be zero.
Father and son always had similar personalities. It was unknown whether it was inherited or influenced, but Goldie was as honest and bad-tempered as his father. It was said that Section Chief Huang was a well-known honest person in the court. According to him, he was the vice president back then, and Director Wei was also the vice president. When the two of them competed for the position of president, Old Huang lost. Later on, Director Wei became the vice president. The old comrade said that he didn't understand until he was forty-two years old that a basket of honorary certificates was useless. Yi Ren was glad that he realized it earlier than the old comrade. He also knew that the honorary certificate was something to comfort people, and it wouldn't work at any time. By the time the old comrade realized that he was no longer fighting for the certificate of honor, time was already running out. The court transferred the old man to the audit department. This was originally a sinecure, but the old man saw it as very important. He heard that he was not sloppy at all when it came to the accounts, and because of this, he had offended many leaders and colleagues. However, Yi Ren suddenly remembered that there was once a year's year-end settlement account. It was clearly denounced as a pile of pig grass, but how could it be passed in a muddle? Therefore, Section Chief Huang was not a person with sharp eyes. Yi Ren once again realized the importance of " seeing is believing ". Otherwise, how could she have a comprehensive evaluation of Section Chief Huang? However, there must be a reason why people said that Section Chief Huang was straightforward and had a strong temper.
On the day that Section Chief Huang sent Xiao Huang to the court to work, at the " Welcome Newcomer " banquet, Section Chief Huang was forced to get drunk. Section Chief Huang, who was forced to get drunk, did not hold back his words. He said that there was no good person in the government and that they all relied on " seduction " to make a name for themselves. Women relied on giving their bodies to women, and men relied on money to flatter them. Those who made a fortune weren't good people either. They were all people who did whatever they wanted! He didn't know when the old man had become so enlightened. In the past, Yi Ren would refute it with the theory of "majority and minority", but slowly, Yi Ren also saw that there was something wrong, so he couldn't object to Old Huang's point of view.
With Section Chief Huang gone, Xiao Huang had to rely on his own cases to earn his living expenses.
Xiao Huang had studied law in an amateur college, so his legal skills should be pretty good.
However, it was one thing to have a high level of law enforcement, but it was another matter to be able to get a case. Xiao Huang had only solved one case in the three months he had been in the court. He had only received a hundred yuan and completed one-fiftieth of the task. Of course, his salary was not guaranteed.
Yi Ren had advised Goldie that it was useless to be anxious.
The 1998 court was surprisingly quiet! Almost no one entered the court.
How could there be someone who would take the money to be cheated (it was obvious that they had paid for nothing)? Not only was there a problem with the judgment of the case, but most of the cases were not executed. The court used the money for the cases that were executed... In such a situation, the court should naturally calm down.
However, young people always had a temper. After three consecutive months of not getting paid and being reprimanded by President Nian, the newcomer, Xiao Huang, finally " pulled himself together " and went out to look for the source of the case.
The first case they found was called Yi Ren, who shook his head.
President Nian was the one who introduced this case. He heard that Section Chief Huang had a heart-to-heart talk with the president. President Nian felt that he should help Xiao Huang. He told Xiao Huang over the phone that he had a friend who had an IOU in the hands of another friend. It would cost 500 yuan to withdraw the IOU. After the IOU was withdrawn, the court would examine it to see if it was useful. If it was useful, he would immediately pay the money to sue. The amount of the IOU was 20,000 yuan. The friend said, If the court could recover the money, it didn't matter if they charged a little more.
Goldie borrowed money from Yiren, saying that 200 yuan was enough. He had 300 yuan from home.
The writer's writing technique was already at the end of its rope. It was nothing more than exaggeration to the end. The life in the writer's pen was not real life. Even if it was realistic, it was taken out of context. Misunderstanding was considered the second great method. Without misunderstandings, there would be no work. Even contradictory misunderstandings were commonplace. It was inevitable that farmers would be humiliated, and great people would fabricate sayings. They would often accuse good people, protect bad people, measure people's stomachs with their own hearts, treat imagination as reality, and beautify life and whimsical thoughts…Finally, there were works about the real life of small figures such as "The Happy Life of the Garrulous Zhang Damin" and "Mother-in-law, Daughter-in-law, and Aunt", but Wang changed the subject. What was originally a "dog-like existence" was nailed to a "happy life". What was originally "trivial and helpless"(but it was true!）”However, they were labeled as three names without any thoughts. It did not conform to the rules of naming articles learned by junior high school students. All the articles did not dare to be close to reality. It was unknown what they were afraid of or what they wanted to cater to. They treated the thoughts stuffed into the articles as the lifeblood of the articles and the cliché plot as life...
Writing was a helpless profession!
Writing was supposed to be a profession.
However, it would only make people despise him even more if he still thought that he was virtuous when he was already a professional writer. Wang Shuo was a hero. He dared to say that the people from the Writers 'Association were no different from the people who made shoes. They were both professionals, so who was more noble than the other?
There shouldn't be any professional writers, only part-time scribes from all walks of life. What writers wrote was not life, but products, products that exhausted all skills, such as furniture made by carpenters. The author was either humble or superior. He looked up to the so-called great people and wrote a great person who was not in the mortal world. He looked at the living beings like ants moving. He completely forgot who he was, forgot his true emotions, noble and despicable, forgot his own efforts, persistence, loneliness, and pain. How could such literature be learned by people? How would it affect his life? Why didn't he ask Yiren to be blind and have no way to follow?
After thinking so much, it was time for me to take a deep breath. I should take off my glasses and look out the window…Why was it different from what was shown on TV? At this time, there should be singing and an image appearing. On the image was Lu Xun standing on the edge of the cliff in the cold wind. He was emaciated, had a hard goatee, and his long robe fluttered in the wind. He glared at the distance with righteous anger…
It seemed that being a writer was not an easy life. Zhu Ziqing and Lao She committed suicide because of their writing. Wang Meng was classified as a right-wing because of his writing. Someone was imprisoned because of his writing…What was he doing? It was just writing, but she had to suffer so much for her true feelings?
When she saw a certain " Heavenly King " talking about his artistic psychology of " always remembering the audience," Yi Ren was disgusted. Who was the one who gave him the title of " Four Heavenly Kings "? Do you really think that you are an artist of the people, Marshal Canopy? " The Four Heavenly Kings " were just man-made words. They were fabricated by the reporters who wanted the world to be in chaos. It was a blow from the genius reporters who followed the trend. Suddenly, the four words were fixed." The Four Heavenly Kings ", but the person was still the same person as before. He wasn't that high up, and it wasn't everything. Seeing that the " stars " were small, you were floating on your own? How could the Four Heavenly Kings be fake? The Three Musketeers and the Five Teachers College were just unrealistic symbols! What about the Four Great Classics? Why wasn't it one of the Three Great Classics? The Five Great Classics? Was it to cater to the popularity of the word "four"?
Was it because I didn't cultivate properly that I was filled with lofty and vulgar Heaven Nourishing Jade? When he was thrown into the human world, he became a voluntary observer of the world. He used his eyes and heart to record everything in the world, as if he had to report to someone. Wasn't this the point of view in 'Dream of the Red Chamber'? Why copy other people's thoughts? But when I had this idea, I really didn't think that there would be a similar saying in 'Dream of the Red Chamber'.
Why do you write critical articles about people who are far away? Are the people and things around you not worthy of criticism? But criticizing the people around her was not safe and would cause trouble! Isn't a troublesome criticism worth criticizing?
Who was a scholar? What was knowledge? Why do you need to learn so much?
Some people said," The central government's policies are good, but the people below have used them askew." Was a policy that allowed the people below to use it askew really a good policy? Does the central government only care about policies?
Should I wait until my passion runs out before I start writing? By then, I won't be able to write a word, but I'll have to squeeze it out like toothpaste?
I saw a general manager of a big city-level company idolize Andy Liu. That's strange. He's an artist, and you're a general manager who does things. His work isn't as meaningful as yours. Why should you idolize him?
Isn't life all about buying lottery tickets? Those who didn't win the lottery had been looking forward to it and working hard. Once they won the lottery, they would become rich overnight and have unlimited glory. However, those who won the lottery were, after all, the minority! There were many people who were working hard on the lottery!
He insisted on looking at society through colored glasses and everything around him. When he saw injustice, he would curse. In Li Ao's eyes, wasn't everything the target of criticism? Aren't you afraid that Li Ao will expose everything about you to the sun at any time, until you're completely ruined? What fun would Li Ao have in life without friends? Didn't you also swear that you wouldn't let go of any unfairness or injustice? Do you also want to become a loner like Li Ao? That was too scary. How could a person help each other and have fun without friends? The joy of kindness! If you weren't Li Ao, wouldn't you be a peacemaker who turned a blind eye? Wouldn't you tolerate others, tolerate yourself doing some unjust things, and be an unjust person? However, being Li Ao was too difficult. He had to go to jail. He had no friends, no women, and nothing. When he was old, he could only earn some money by relying on the reputation he had suffered.
How should I create value for the world? If he didn't even understand what value was, how could he create value?
Why were the people reported by the media all like immortals? They couldn't care less about their wives 'complaints and threw the family's money out. Both of them were sick but did not forget to work until the last moment of their lives. It was all because their father had died and they could not show their filial piety for the last time, because there was something more important than their father's death. They were all impartial and had offended all their good friends and family. All of them are working hard and living plainly. They even bring their wives to make dry rations when they go on business trips…But why isn't there anyone like this by my side? On the contrary…could it be that good people were far away from us? But the people he was familiar with in the newspaper were also of noble character and integrity? So it was all made up! How could all the advanced figures have the same story? They were all "invented" by one person and copied by others! In this way, people in the real world didn't have any sense of pride. They had done a good job and were considered successful, but compared to the overwhelming number of advanced people, they were really too small and even too ashamed. There would be two outcomes. One would continue to follow the pioneers (reported), and the other would simply give up on the idea of being a good person. If being a good person was already so hard, what was the attraction? Those who continued to follow would eventually give up the idea of following because the advanced figures were too far away. They would be ordinary people in their hearts. This was the evil consequence of elevating the advanced figures for no reason. This logic was too obvious. Who didn't know? However, all kinds of publicity had been fed with fattening agents. It was hard not to increase their prices crazily. Hence, they kept pulling out and chasing each other, forcefully writing the advanced figures in life as immortals. Wherever there were words, there would be unprincipled elevation. This was already a universally acknowledged rule. Therefore, no one could return to simplicity when writing an article. If that was the case, your article would not be attractive. The characters and deeds you wrote would not be advanced. Your writing principles would not conform to the rules of the public. How could you not be shot to death? Who would want to be shot? Are you the one who broke the rules? Yi Ren said that this kind of unwarranted increase in writing was a "great leap forward" in writing, but no one denounced it. If it continued to climb all the way, no one knew how high the people depicted in the text would eventually reach, but could there be a limit to the development of the text? Wasn't it just about how bold a person was, how prolific a literary talent was? Wasn't it true that the Eight Immortals crossed the sea, each displaying their own magical powers? Therefore, Yi Ren had a fear of words. Words did not bring accurate information, but endless bragging. It was a myth of immortals descending to the mortal world. Even words could not be trusted. Was there anything trustworthy in this world? Wasn't writing the lifeblood of a scholar? What's wrong with those writers who are scholars or not? Character communication, event tracking, work summary, speech report, which one of them was not full of adjectives, which one was not emotional and tear-jerking? But which one was realistic? If words became a form of pure art, would they still be a tool for transmitting information? Was it still the ladder of human progress?
A hooligan hid in a dark place for more than a week, no matter the weather. Finally, he snatched a bun. Not long after, the hooligan was also arrested. During the interrogation, the hooligan actually boasted shamelessly,"It's quite tough in our line of work. We have to start from the bottom. If we're really not afraid of hardship, tiredness, beatings, or getting caught, we can rise after a long time of training.”Heavens! Didn't he just say that he was working hard? Wasn't hard work a patent invented by people of insight to change the world? Why did a hooligan have to work hard? Then, wasn't the pride of working hard in the past just a sense of self-satisfaction?
My nephew was originally a worker who did not like to study and did not seem to have any achievements. However, he was also full of words such as " protect the environment,"" backward concepts,"" put an end to face projects," and " popular projects " that seemed to be words that only the intellectual could say. However, he did not seem to have put in any effort for this. Could it be that the righteousness of the Chinese Dynasty only needed to be hung on everyone's lips?
Yi Ren felt that some things had happened repeatedly, and they were shockingly similar.
Was this considered growing up? Had all of his past fantasies about growing up come true? But now, he still had his imagination? Had he not truly grown up?
Would there be no good works without exposing the dark society? But there should be a variety of works. Why must it be limited to exposing the dark society?
Don't say that the common people's legal awareness is low, your court is even lower. How many legal requests of others have been rejected by you for no reason? If they are higher, it will be even harder for you to resist!
The appeal had to alert the central government. Only by alerting the central government would there be a really good outcome.
There should be another meaning to being muddle-headed. Not only did it mean turning a blind eye to people and things, but it also meant that one should be muddle-headed about their thoughts. What was the justice of life, the value of life, and the mode of being a person? No one could say for sure, so it was better to be confused and figure out what it was for. Wouldn't it be the same if he didn't figure it out?
I will never be excited by songs that praise the good life again. Life was like that. It was neither very good nor very bad, so why should he cry over a song?
It seemed that everyone had become a mother. The principles that should be adhered to had long been thrown to Guawa. If Japan invaded again, being a traitor would probably be the most sought-after job. Being a traitor would also benefit them, so why not?
Why don't you just admit that you won mentally and find some comfort for yourself? Isn't that a good move? Why would he oppose the spiritual victory method? Isn't optimism, self-confidence, and thinking more positively a way to win mentally?
How good was a person to be called a good person, and how bad was a person to be called a bad person? If you average out the good and bad of everyone, what level is the average at? Is the average good or bad? If the average is worth the bad guys (a little bit bad!）Why should I be a good person? There's nothing wrong with going with the flow, right? The average value of human nature is already like this, so why should I suffer for a little selfishness? If the average value of human nature is bad, but you have to swear to be a good person, is it also against the laws of nature? Being a good person was emphasized by others, but the person who emphasized it might not be able to do it himself. If he couldn't do it himself, why should we stick to it? The ones who surface are bad people, but do you think all the people who are submerged in water are good people? The bad guys submerged in water were just more concealed! The good and bad of people were just more concealed! According to quantum mechanics, the good and bad of humans were definitely not polar opposites, but a gradual process. There were all good people, 10% bad people, 20% bad people…90% bad people, and all bad people. So where was the boundary between good and bad people? No one could tell. There was no dividing line at all. Did the law have the right to draw this dividing line? The law only punishes the most evil people, not all bad people. Does morality have the right to draw this line? Morality is like the speech of an official, wavering. How can we accurately distinguish between a good person and a bad person? However, the rule was absolute. As the saying goes, there are more in the middle and less in the middle. There was another rule that was absolute. Once the number of good people increased, the average value of human nature would lean towards the good people. On the contrary, it would lean towards the bad people. This rule was also correct to apply to officialdom. Now that there were many bad officials in officialdom, the average value would definitely lean towards the bad people. But how close was it? It was hard to explain. As for the prevarication of "most of them are good" and "there is true love in the world", it was of course a cliché. No one said that most people were bad. When "most people are bad", would we still be saved?
I suspect that Lu Xun can't be noble every day.
Are you doubting everything? Even Lu Xun was suspicious! But there was nothing wrong with that. Lu Xun was not an immortal. He had his selfish moments, but why were there no records of his selfishness? Who is deceiving us? Wouldn't it be even more true if there were records of his selfishness? Wouldn't she be able to dispel more unrealistic guesses if she knew exactly how selfish he was? Even Confucius, the sage, was not as high as we thought. He said so many things, but he did not necessarily do everything. It was easier said than done. Moreover, his views were not all right, and those different from him were not all wrong. Therefore, Confucius could not be noble forever.
Why do you keep thinking about studying and taking exams? Back then, when he was in school, he was always thinking about social practice. Now that he had entered society, he turned around and thought about studying and taking exams. Wasn't this the mentality of being in Cao's camp but in Han's heart? In the past, when he could not compare to others in terms of reading, he denied that he was good in reading and exams. Now, when he could not compare to others in terms of practice, he kept talking about the chaos of real life. What kind of mentality was this? Wasn't he trying to escape from reality? Wasn't he trying to find a way to be noble?
He had once thought that a fool with a big belly could destroy 100 enemies, but now he didn't think so. Why did he say that people who were good at a big belly were fools? In real life, only a fool would not understand Ah Yu! Nowadays, Ah Yu was a compulsory course in life. It was the art of winning in officialdom. Everyone was proud of Ah Yu. Being good at Ah Yu meant that he would be a good person and a successful life. Why compare Ah Yu's experts to bad guys? No one would think that a plump person was ugly. Only people would worry about not being good at a plump person and not having good results. All kinds of plump unique skills were widely circulated, and all kinds of cases of being good after a plump person ascended to the elegant hall. The person who was plump would feel at ease because the plump culture had long been deeply rooted in people's hearts. Therefore, it was no wonder that people did not have a high awareness. Moreover, the plump technique was constantly developing, and there was a tendency for it to break out of elegance and enter the world. The plump person had a raise in salary, a promotion, and a ranking. The plump person and the plump person who had received many benefits remembered one truth: Ah Yu was the absolute truth!
What kind of exquisite machinery could humans create after racking their brains? No matter how exquisite something was, wasn't it still a fake in the eyes of God?
Didn't the country say before that it wanted to free all mankind? Was that the same as ruling the world? However, when did it change and say that it would never dominate the world?
The president of the Supreme Court, Xiao Yang, had participated in the interview with the minister. However, he was the president of the court, not the minister! The People's Court was created by the NPC and was responsible to the NPC. Why did it become a department under the government? Xiao Yang understood, but he did not raise any objections. Why? Should the laws and courts of China be so muddled? Even the Supreme Court Chief didn't stick to his principles. What can we small fries do?
Why didn't the Administrative Litigant Law specify which level of court one should sue for administrative actions that were against the law? I didn't even prepare any administrative actions that you're not willing to accept!
I always say that "most of it is good". This is in line with the theory of metaphysics. I think there are times when the theory of metaphysics is not scientific. The gold content of a gold mine is only 0.00% and the rest is trash. Can you say that most of the gold mine is good? Then could he say that the gold mine was not worth keeping?
Jiang Zilong said that it was great to be 60 years old. I said,"Bullshit. Why would a great writer like you say such meaningless things?" Isn't it good to be 50 years old? Since every year is good, why write that 60 years old is good?
What was the objective law of life? Aren't people led by the nose by the objective laws of life? Then what was the point of all the ideals and hard work?
How could a writer understand the psychology of a bad person? When a noble author fell into the bad guy's shoes, wouldn't he play the bad guy's mind? Was it really only possible to think but not do it? Who could guarantee that they would abide by the rules?
I can't be an official. It's too difficult to advance by leaps and bounds without any backing.
This book comes from：m.funovel.com。