Time: 2009-12- 22 14:00:24 Words: 7826
31
Mu Dawang was arguing with a female party again. It seemed like he couldn't settle this matter himself.
Mu Dawang was too unsettling. Of course, he was a good person. He didn't smoke, drink, curse, or swear. He didn't come late or leave early, didn't form cliques, didn't accept money, and didn't seek personal gain... Of course, he was an absolutely good person. Not only did he go to work on time, but he also went home on time. Whether it was snowing heavily or the heat was unbearable, he went to work and returned home on time. Sometimes, his head was covered in snow, and the hair in his eyes was frozen. Sometimes, he was sweaty, and his clothes were soaked in water. According to his personality, Yi Ren once made up a joke for him: One day, it was freezing cold and snowing heavily. Out of concern for everyone, President Nian told everyone not to go home at night and to eat dog meat in the court. However, when it was almost time to eat, Mu Dawang was nowhere to be found. He waited for nearly half an hour. His eyebrows were frozen, and his hair was steaming as he rode his bicycle to the court. President Nian asked him where he had gone, and he said,""I went back and told my wife that I won't be coming home tonight.”Once, when he was on a business trip, a few people asked him to queue up to buy tickets to a certain place. After queuing for more than an hour, he returned empty-handed. Because he was too well-behaved, those who did not behave cut in line and shouted to greet the ticket seller. He behaved obediently, but when it was his turn, the ticket seller handed the ticket to someone behind him. Did Mu Dawang do anything wrong? He was not wrong. What was wrong with an honest person? What was wrong with queuing up? But if he wasn't honest, what would you do? The standard answer should be," It's their business if they don't follow the rules. We can't break the rules ourselves. It's just like how a thousand people killing people can't prove that killing people is reasonable." However, the answer was the answer. Most people didn't do that. Some people cut the line, but no one cared. What should I do? I cut the line too! It would be a waste not to interfere. It was a fool to stick to the rules. This was Li Xixiao's point of view. Yi Ren did not object. Seeing the reality, could Yi Ren object? Opposing it meant that he would never be able to buy an admission ticket. Li Xixiao squeezed into the crowd and finally bought an admission ticket. Li Xixiao had obviously broken the rules. If you don't break the rules, you can only turn around and leave. Where can you guarantee that you will follow the rules?
President Nian had always publicly praised Mu Dawang for his honesty, seriousness, honesty, and self-discipline. However, he had never praised Mu Dawang for being advanced, nor did he give him any benefits. In reality, he had only praised him on the surface and neglected him in his actions. President Mu believed that Mu Dawang would never be able to accomplish anything.
Then what kind of person could get things done? President Nian thought that Li Xixiao was the most capable. But didn't President Nian often criticize Li Xixiao?
However, the mass media and the national propaganda department were also asking people to be honest. Were they asking for people like Mu Dawang who could be praised but could not be put in important positions? If not, what kind of honest people are they asking us to be? Was he a person who could break the rules flexibly? What was flexibility? Criminals also broke the rules. Were their actions flexible? Of course it wasn't flexible, but how flexible was it? When Li Xixiao bought the tickets, no one criticized him or punished him!
Yi Ren also began to teach Mu Dawang to be flexible. In fact, Yi Ren hated those people who were smooth and slick. If you asked them to be flexible, wouldn't you be asking them to be bad? However, he felt that he was more honest than Mu Dawang. In other words, there were different levels of honesty. Which level was the most correct? Whose level was higher than Yiren's? Whose level was higher than…If he kept going up, would he still be honest? Yiren said that when everyone was at home, of course it was better to be honest and not let friends scheme against friends. But when they were out, they couldn't be too honest. When it was time to act like a dog, they had to act like a dog and not let others look down on them. When it was time to be arrogant, they had to be arrogant and not let others think that they were incompetent. When it was time to look for an opportunity, he had to look for an opportunity. He didn't want others to think that he was a fool…But with so many " nimbleness " added together, was he still a good person? However, if he had to be a good person as required by the publicity department, would he be able to do anything?
Mu Dawang's current problem was that he couldn't " explain things clearly to a country bumpkin." Her husband had filed a lawsuit for a divorce, but the woman insisted on withdrawing the lawsuit. How could she withdraw the lawsuit? Mu Dawang had been explaining for the entire morning, and he couldn't stop even when it was time for lunch. She didn't understand, or perhaps she was pretending not to understand.
Looking at Mu Dawang's flushed face, Yi Ren couldn't bear to not help.
Yiren explained to the female party what a lawsuit was and what it meant to withdraw the lawsuit, but she said that she had not studied and did not understand.
……
The female party crashed into Yiren like crazy.
Mu Dawang stood at the side in a daze.
" This is crazy…" Li Xixiao rushed in and pulled the female party away. The female party took off her shoes and hit Li Xixiao in the face…
Li Xixiao pressed the female party to the ground, but she did not scream or make a fuss. After a while, she went out barefoot.
Li Xixiao, how could you press him to the ground?
But I'm helping you out!
An hour later, two carriages carrying more than ten young men rushed into the court.
It was the female party who had called for help.
"We have to jump over the wall and run!" Li Xixiao said.
"Nonsense, you can only do it in court today!”
Yiren took the initiative to go down to the first floor, and a group of people surrounded him.
"What do you want?"
"What's the matter? We're here for revenge. Who hit a woman just now?”
Yi Ren couldn't answer that he didn't call because he couldn't betray his friends!
Someone pulled Yiren's clothes and touched his face.
"Your surname is Li?"
"My surname is not Li."
I didn't betray my friend by saying that my surname isn't President Li, right? My surname is indeed not Li.
"Go find that Li guy!"
"He went out. We can talk about anything!"
"Talk? What's there to talk about? We have to fight back."
"We didn't hit anyone. Don't listen to one side of the story. I admit that the way we solved the problem was wrong, but we definitely didn't hit anyone.”
Half of them rushed up to the second floor, while the other half stayed behind. Yi Ren knew that she wouldn't be beaten up.
"The court didn't hit anyone. Besides, you can report the case. It's not right for you to take revenge on your own.”
"What right do you have to say? If he hits someone and goes to the south to work, who can catch him?”
A group of people rushed down again, not knowing what had happened upstairs.
Two carriages carrying more than a dozen people left the court.
God bless that nothing happened? Li Xixiao probably hadn't been beaten up, or else he wouldn't be so calm.
Yi Ren asked everyone to "discuss" and the final conclusion was: Anyway, we didn't do anything wrong. It was the female party who caused trouble and should be detained according to the law. The matter of more than ten people rushing to the court can be ignored because he didn't do anything. We'll report this matter directly to the head of the court because President Nian is a timid person. He has always been afraid of force and not soft. If we ask him to handle it, he will only criticize us and will not detain the troublemakers.
President Nian called very soon and told everyone not to leave. He would come immediately.
It seemed that reporting directly to the hospital leaders was useless.
President Nian came and criticized Li Xixiao. Then, he asked Yiren to buy some things to take a look at the " injured person ".
Yi Ren refused.
Mu Dawang could only go.
The person who should have been detained became the victim. President Nian, how could you handle things like this?
Li Xixiao gave himself a break.
Yiren also suffered a huge blow. If this continued, wouldn't the wicked go to heaven? What kind of judge are we? Just call it fermented beancurd. It's ugly and easy to bully!
President Nian continued to praise Mu Dawang for taking the big picture into consideration and not causing trouble.
But this matter was originally caused by Mu Dawang. Yiren and Li Xixiao were all helping him!
The essays on the philosophy of life were shallow, and the articles on the skills of life were ignorant. How dare you forget the worries of the country when you live in humble places? To whom should I grieve? How could he be worried? Was hiding at home and moping sad enough? Don't think that you've found a magic treasure so easily! What jump rate, what drawing on a blank piece of paper? Why couldn't the previous emperor find such an easy treasure? It was easier said than done. A beautiful idea had run into a wall in reality! Wouldn't it be better to take one step at a time, enrich oneself in practice, and correct oneself in practice?
Did the leader of the Mao family earnestly teach and hope? Weren't they all the same ordinary people with different roles? Why is it that the leader can be taught and we can't? It seems that his ordinary is different from ours! ** Should he report this to the police? Isn't directing traffic also a job? What was the difference between this and the traffic police directing traffic? Because of the difference in official positions? Wasn't the official position determined by the needs of the job? Wasn't it forbidden to look at the difference between adults? Then I'm also a human. Will there be any media coverage if I go and direct traffic? Is there any difference between me and the Prime Minister? Weren't they all the same people working in different positions?
Why were celebrities good in every aspect and role models? Quality, professionalism, mannerism, speech and mannerisms…Then, was a celebrity a god? Why only glorify celebrities? The author beautified the protagonist, and the reporter beautified the person being interviewed. It seemed that they were doing people a favor.
Someone said behind Yiren's back that Yiren was sincere.
What's wrong with having a heart? A sincere heart meant that one was loyal and not cunning! But why did people always show a disdainful expression when they said that someone was sincere? Parents always look disappointed when they say that their children are sincere? Was it bad to be honest?
I really want to sponsor a poor student to go to school. I really want to donate blood for someone who urgently needs blood. I really want to…but the court won't even return the salary that they owe me. How can I have the money to sponsor others? But…I don't seem to have a chance to do good.
How did celebrities rise up? Celebrities don't rely on their abilities to become famous. Aren't celebrities all virtuous and talented? Celebrities are famous because of us, but why should we go and make them arrogant? Can't we just ignore him? Who supports the leader? The leader is supported by the people. It should be said that the people are more important than the leader, but why should we curry favor with the leader and praise the leader? Can't we claim our own rights? However, it was easier said than done. People's hearts could not be unified. There would always be people who would curry favor with the leaders for the purpose of obtaining benefits. If someone obtained benefits, would they still worry about not following the trend? Everyone had followed the trend. Could it be reversed? However, there was at least one thing that could be done. Don't deify the leader, don't blindly follow the leader. We have our own views, our own goals, and our own methods. Isn't that better? But someone advised me that blindly following the leader is the absolute truth. Why should I listen to others? If they knew it was right, why not support it? People said," Whether you do well or not, the key is to ask the leader." Therefore, there was no absolute standard of good or bad. There was only a relative standard of whether the leader appreciated it. It was better to please the leader than to do well. If you please the leader, even if you did not do well, you could still get good. Therefore, how to please the leader was the " good " that you should really work hard to pursue.
The government had thought that it was omnipotent, but in reality, it was not omnipotent. There were too many disappointments. Therefore, some smart people began to change their way of thinking. One was to reduce the authority of the government. After all, it had nothing to do with the government whether it was good or bad for things that should not be handled by the government. The second was to change abstract standards into specific standards. The so-called abstract standards used standards such as "improving the living standards of the masses" and "changing the situation" as the goal of the government's work. These standards were too abstract and difficult to improve. It was like pouring water into the sea and not being able to see the rise of the sea. It was better to use detailed and specific standards, such as doing a few practical things and solving a few problems. It seemed that as long as the government completed these "few", everything would be fine. It was a success. Whether it was good or bad, it was obvious at a glance. But would the government give up on abstract standards? So how many detailed standards should be formulated to be the original intention of setting up governments at all levels? Was it really like " if the horn doesn't sound, turn around and blow it, do one thing at a time "?
The cook said that girls with sweet mouths were likable. But Yi Ren didn't think so. What should be said and what should not be said was determined by objective facts. It was not something that could be decided by whether the words were sweet or not. Could it be that a person with a sweet mouth could only say good things or even make up more good things? Wasn't this fake? Wasn't it just flattery? Wasn't it just verbal bribery?
In the past, the stories about the bad morals and impure human nature were just a thought. After listening to them, they would usually laugh it off and get angry. But now, they could not. They were already in the real world. Many things that they could not accept had happened around them, and they had even experienced it themselves. Could they still be angry and laugh? It wasn't that simple anymore. He really felt that he was caught off guard, that he couldn't accept it, and that his heart ached. It was like knowing that a woman had a bad reputation, but when you saw her sitting next to you with her breasts exposed, you would be equally shocked and feel incredulous.
How could the law have a role in regulating? Clearly, it only had the effect of pranking people. If the leader wanted to prank people, he would use the law to cause a ruckus. There was no comrade who could really stand the ruckus, so the law was logical!
Why was it that "adding feet to a snake" was a bad thing and "adding wings to a tiger" was a good thing? Could it be that there was also the problem of being born rich and poor in the idiom world? Was it unfair? So, was it good or bad to add a portion? Who knew?
I can't become a celebrity! I'm not the descendant of a famous family. How many people in the literary and entertainment world are active just because they're the descendants of a famous family? As the saying goes,"dragons give birth to dragons, phoenixes give birth to phoenixes, and the son of a mouse knows how to make holes". Also, in politics, how many young and promising leaders are the children of old leaders!
Who said that metaphor could make the language vivid? Then, was it that " hair " was more vivid than " waterfall " or " waterfall " was more vivid than " hair "? Obviously, there were people who compared " hair " to " waterfall ", and there were also people who compared " waterfall " to " hair ". It was just another way of saying it, and it had nothing to do with vivid. One way of saying it was to be stubborn, and another way of saying it was to be flexible. This was the metaphor of the dialect.
How I yearned to travel the mountains and hills after I became famous, write, publish books, appear on television, and give lectures in university…
Will I get rickets in the face of disaster?
There was a difference between wit and cunning, but it was impossible to distinguish them in actual use. It was just personal likes and dislikes. To say that you were cunning was to hate you, to say that you were witty was to admire you, but it was possible that you thought that cunning people were very loyal, and you thought that witty people were very cunning. This was the language of the motherland. It was so complicated to use it, if you didn't look at it with a colored eye.
Scholars are politicians 'slaves?
Who was a scholar? Who was the politician?
The officialdom was as deep as the sea. He was really too afraid!
Isn't being an official a sign of success? How could he realize his thoughts if he did not become an official? How to pursue fairness and justice?
Why am I superstitious? He was happy to see the number with an '8'. He thought that any case that he participated in would go smoothly. He thought…
He no longer dared to have any more dreams in his heart.
It had been a long time since she had a dream. People were really weird. Without her dreams, she would really lose her dreams. She slept like a log every night. When she woke up, it was already dawn. Didn't he have all sorts of weird dreams in the past?
However, for no reason, she dreamed of the college entrance examination and failed again. She was so anxious. Wasn't it seven or eight years since the college entrance examination? Why was he still unwilling?
Is it fair to me that others succeed because of their family background? But don't you have any leading families? Didn't someone surpass you in elementary school? However, they were unable to attend school because of their poor families. If these people did not drop out of school, would they be able to compete with you?
Leader Mao's policy of going to the mountains and countryside was not wrong. It only required the educated youth to be close to society, love labor, and work hard. But what if you go to the countryside now? No way! You read so many books just to leave the countryside!
Compared to the future of the country, was it better to have one more businessman or one more intellectual? Those who had answered similar questions before answered without hesitation," Of course, the intellectual was more important than the businessman. But now, he hesitated. First of all, he was confused. What was the future of the country? Who was the intellectual and who was the businessman? It was difficult to define the standards of good or bad. Were the intellectual really more important than the businessman? Without successful businessmen, how could the country's economy develop? In fact, both intellectual and businessman were very important. There should be a scientific ratio. It was not good for either one to have more. Moreover, there was no absolute gap between the two.
It was still unclear whether news was objective or subjective, but there was a constant stream of " paid news " again. In other words, what was paid was news, and what was not paid was not news. If a dog bites someone, as long as money was paid, it would still be reported. If a person bites a dog, as long as money was paid, it would also not be reported. The more money there was, the more words there would be, and the more prominent the position would be. And vice versa. This was the news economy. What was the original intention of setting up news? Was it to earn money? There were many ways to make money. Why should he rely on the news to make money? News was a channel to transmit information, but if this channel was blocked by snobbery, wouldn't it confuse the public? What was the point of truth, fairness, and justice in this world? There were too many industries in China. There was the education industry to educate people, and there was the law enforcement industry to regulate society. Therefore, everything was about money. Everyone came to make money. In the end, the atmosphere was chaotic and the rules were broken. They did not know how to clean it up.
He had thought that the market economy was a panacea that came late, so he always liked to look at everything and analyze everything from the perspective of the market. However, he was really wrong. The market couldn't control everything. Some important things really couldn't be left to fend for themselves in the market. For example, elegant art, philosophy, psychology, and at least there had to be appropriate guidance, protection, and rescue.
A leather shoe store in the county town had changed its name for the fifth time. Leather shoe store--genuine leather shoe store. The longer the name was, the more determined it was to express "genuine leather", but the business was declining. Why was that? Because our world is too impetuous and too empty, the names you painstakingly come up with can't be logically convincing, so the seller is confused, and the consumer is also confused. Both sides are confused and suspicious. No one can trust the other, so how can business not become less and less? Therefore, the shop owner simply returned to his original simplicity and used the simplest and clearest name of the shop.
Yiren wanted to write an article," It's really true."
Suddenly, he wondered if his mother had committed suicide.﹗
Her mother once said," It's better for one person to be trapped in the earth than ten people running on the ground." Did she see that no one in the family could find a way to develop, and she was unable to get close to the dignitaries, so she simply thought of a feasible move--to go to the underworld to bless this family? No way! Why would his mother do that? How can you think like that?
Yiren wanted to write an article," Oh My God."
Yi Ren constantly warned himself not to see through the mortal world. What was the point of staying in this world after seeing through the mortal world? He wanted to become a monk and commit suicide. However, it was human nature to be afraid of death! How could he not see through the world of mortals? Everything that happened around her surprised Yiren, and she never stopped feeling pain. She thought that the law was the most noble, but the law was manipulated by people, even bullying the weak and climbing up to the rich. She thought that the leaders were willing to contribute, but the officials were all fat. The leaders 'family had five sons, and everyone enjoyed happiness. Originally, it was said that " a prince who breaks the law is the same as a commoner ", but the son of a small deputy county head could actually get away with murder. Until the old master committed a crime, his son was also brought to justice, and he was handcuffed at the same time! Why didn't they enforce the law strictly in the past? They thought that officials relied on their own efforts to make progress, but everyone knew that everyone who made progress had a background of their own progress. It had nothing to do with personal efforts. She thought that the old comrade was not snobbish and abhorred evil, but she clearly saw that the old comrade was also black-hearted, mushy, and did not forget snobbish. He thought that justice would eventually triumph over evil, but he saw the police and the gangsters calling each other brothers. He had thought that the authors and professors could at least maintain a little justice in the world, but it was clear that the authors and professors had also betrayed their character. Their faces did not turn red, nor did they jump…
Why did he always believe that as long as he worked hard, he would be able to stand out and eventually become the highest official?
Were the people who became the most important officials all people who had gone through strict assessments and surpassed others in every way?
Then why did he believe that hard work determined everything?
Success was 85% chance 15% ability, which meant that opportunity was far more important than ability. But opportunity could only be found by chance, not by seeking. Didn't that mean that the president wasn't the best? Then why not replace the best person to be the president?
Was it up to the so-called economics to decide whether to take the road of market economy or not? Who could say? The people? When did the people speak? Wu Jinglian and the others were only popular because they catered to the government's point of view. There was no other reason.
The lives of the common people were indeed much better than before. How could he not feel gratified?
What does it have to do with you? Who do you think you are? You don't even have a salary to pay, so why should you care about other people's lives? His own butt was bleeding, and he still wanted to help others diagnose hemorrhoids!
However, my life is definitely higher than the average standard of the common people. We have to be content. So what if it was higher? Would those who were higher than you sympathize with you? Who needs your sympathy? When everyone is higher than you, will you still care about others? Wouldn't you become a god?
There was a kind man who was also a rich man. Every day, he would climb several miles of mountain roads to burn incense in the temple on the mountain. After a long time, the abbot was moved and moved the temple to the foot of the mountain (the temple was not big). This way, it would be convenient for the kind man. However, the kind-hearted person said that there was no need to climb the mountain so hard. He just wanted to burn incense. How could it have any influence? He stopped burning incense.
So it was fake that you were burning incense, but the real thing was to affect others 'hearts and make them admire your "kindness"?
Was this kind person wrong? Why couldn't he affect other people's hearts? Who would do a good deed if no one knew, or if very few people knew? If he could not tolerate such a little "snobbery" in human nature, could he tolerate all kinds of evil or no kindness? Was she wrong? He had already offered incense and donated money, so what was wrong with gaining a good reputation? Was he really going to stick to the false creed of doing good deeds without leaving his name? Don't always use the highest standards to ask others. As long as they don't have the lowest standards, there is something worthy of recognition.
Writers, like revolutions, put their personal interests (life and death) beyond the limit. They exist for the benefit of the country and the people, and exist to fight against evil! When fighting against evil, one had to touch the interests of some people in power. They had to be attacked by people who did not understand them. But it did not matter. You had suffered a lot. The people would remember you in their hearts. The people knew who was right and who was wrong. Justice could defeat evil. In the end, the one who won was the one who adhered to justice and the one who was supported by the people!
Was it really possible to insist on not sucking up to anyone? The emperor also needs to borrow troops, how can you "keep yourself as pure as jade"?
The hosts on television were also full of lies and pleasantries, but why didn't they say anything from the bottom of their hearts? It was not easy to come up with " Tell the truth ". They thought that they could change the screen that was full of lies from now on. However," Tell the truth " did not have a single honest sentence. It was all just words of formality and insurance. It was a topic that did not need to be told the truth. No one dared to say a topic that really needed to be told the truth. It really ruined the noble words " Tell the truth ". Originally," telling the truth " was a world-recognized historical problem. How could a vulgar television person solve it? He would not be determined to crack it, he just unintentionally borrowed a name to use!
He also said that there were many happy events this year, such as the 15th National Congress and the return of Hong Kong. However, there were not many major events that year. Wasn't he lying with his eyes closed when he said that this year was more important? However, some people had to find something to say!
Why don't I go teach in the most difficult mountainous areas? Why don't I carry a shoe nailing machine and wander around? He used the income from the spikes to support himself and then continued to wander.
She dreamed that she was admitted to Peking University. So what if she went to Peking University at such an old age? Why didn't he hide his age?
What Peking University? So what if she went to Peking University? A law genius who graduated from Peking University might not necessarily have a good job.
She didn't want to play mahjong anymore. There was no point in throwing a few yuan back and forth. Let's go to the lottery tomorrow!
Why is it that you're the one who always asks people out to play mahjong, but you're also the one who says it's boring? Didn't he play mahjong on and off for almost two months?
How about this, let's test the winning index first. If we can touch a chicken, we'll hit the jackpot.
I, Yiren, will definitely get a chicken. However, he didn't get a single chicken even after touching it ten times. It didn't matter. If he was unlucky today, it meant that he would be lucky tomorrow. A person couldn't be lucky every day. He was really lucky if he grasped his own luck. I will definitely win the grand prize tomorrow. If I win the grand prize, I, Yiren, will become a rich man. I won't have to worry about some boring things anymore! Actually, winning the lottery was also a legal way to get rich. It was also a chance to seize life! Why should he look down on winning the lottery?
This book comes from：m.funovel.com。